Special Master - Judgment Search Results

Baldev Vs. State and Others

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1992CriLJ1604

the petitioner Baldev also went to that School, took various photographs of the children in the school and specially those of Master Yoann and also harassed him. The petitioner Baldev had told the Principal that he had

Connor Vs. Finch

Court: US Supreme Court

Connor v. Williams, 404 U. S. 549 . Relying on the District Court's stated intention to appoint a Special Master in January, 1972, to consider the subdivision of those counties into single member districts, we vacated the judgment … that "[s]uch proceedings should go forward and be promptly concluded." Id. at 404 U. S. 551 . No Special Master was appointed. In anticipation of the 1975 elections, however, the Mississippi Legislature, in April, 1973, enacted a new

United Airlines, Inc. Vs. Mcdonald

Court: US Supreme Court

entitled to backpay. To aid in determining the amount of each backpay award, the court appointed as a Special Master the same person who had performed a similar task in the Sprogis litigation. [ Footnote 5 ] Following … Court of Appeals of the District Court's finding of liability, the case was remanded for further proceedings. The Special Master appointed by the District Court recommended that the plaintiff be awarded over $10,000 in damages, the District Court

Sebelius Vs. Cloer

Court: US Supreme Court

the clerk of the Court of Federal Claims, who then “immediately” forwards the petition for assignment to a special master. 42 U. S. C. §300aa-11(a)(1). An attorney may not charge a fee for “services in connection with [such] … that the vaccine caused or exacerbated her MS. After reviewing the petition and its supporting documentation, the Chief Special Master concluded that Cloer’s claim was untimely because the Act’s 36-month limitations period began to run when she had

Perry Vs. New Hampshire

Court: US Supreme Court

than two thousand studies related to eyewitness identification have been published. One state supreme court recently appointed a special master to conduct an exhaustive survey of the current state of the scientific evidence and concluded that “[t]he research

Brown Vs. Plata

Court: US Supreme Court

1990, the District Court found that prisoners with serious mental illness do not receive minimal, adequate care. A Special Master appointed to oversee remedial efforts reported 12 years later that the state of mental health care in California’s … , 95, n. 12. Pp. 15-16. (2) Section 3626(a)(3)(A)(i)’s previous order requirement was satisfied in Coleman by the Special Master’s 1995 appointment and in Plata by the 2002 approval of a consent decree and stipulated injunction. Both orders

Bruesewitz Vs. Wyeth Llc

Court: US Supreme Court

of Federal Claims, naming the Secretary of Health and Human Services as the respondent.[ Footnote 13 ] A special master then makes an informal adjudication of the petition within (except for two limited exceptions) 240 days.[ Footnote 14 … two limited exceptions) 240 days.[ Footnote 14 ] The Court of Federal Claims must review objections to the special master’s decision and enter final judgment under a similarly tight statutory deadline.[ Footnote 15 ] At that point, a

Wal-mart Stores, Inc. Vs. Dukes

Court: US Supreme Court

for some 9,541 class members were calculated by selecting 137 claims at random, referring those claims to a special master for valuation, and then extrapolating the validity and value of the untested claims from the sample set. See

Horne Vs. Flores

Court: US Supreme Court

e.g. , Ramos v. Lamm , 639 F. 2d 559, 585-586 (CA10 1980). It does not involve a special master charged with the task of supervising a complex decree that will gradually bring a large institution into compliance

Marshall Vs. Marshall

Court: US Supreme Court

assets in their hands.” Id. , at 431. (In that same case, a federal court later appointed a Special Master to administer the estate. This Court upheld some of the Master’s determinations and rejected others. See Hook v.