Solicitor - Judgment Search Results

Advocate General of Madras Vs. Amanullakhan, Advocate, Salem 1

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1967Mad162; 1967CriLJ551

is Sri Amanullakhan, a member of the Salem Bar, and the proceedings have been initiated by the learned Advocate General under S. 3 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 32 of 1952 and Art. 215 of the

Advocate Cuddalore; Collector of South Arcot Vs. an Advocate

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1958CriLJ1321

Ramachandra Iyer J.1. The respondent is an advocate practising at Cuddalore, South Arcot District. He was appointed to the office of the Public Prosecutor for a

Advocate-general of Madras Vs. Sri Amanullakhan, Advocate

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1966)2MLJ219

is Sri Amanullakhan, a member of the Salem Bar, and the proceedings have been initiated by the learned Advocate-General under Section 3 of the. Contempt of Courts Act, XXXII of 1952 and Article 215 of the Constitution

Re:mohit Chaudhary, Advocate Vs. Mohit Chaudhary, Advocate

Court: Supreme Court of India

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION SUO MOTU CONTEMPT PETITION (CRL.) NO.5 OF2017IN RE : MOHIT CHAUDHARY, ADVOCATE JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. A Noble Profession. An Officer of the Court. An Advocate-on-Record having the privilege

J.R. Parashar, Advocate and ors. Vs. Prasant Bhushan, Advocate and ors ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC3395; 2001(49)BLJR2222; 2001CriLJ4207; 2001(4)Crimes217(SC); JT2001(7)SC189; 2001(5)SCALE524; (2001)6SCC735; 2002(1)LC62(SC)

Matched in: Advocate Altaf Ahmed, Additional Solicitor General,; Romy Chacko,; P. Ram Jethmalani, Sr. Adv., ; Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, ; Ms. Shomil

M.S. Rahi, Advocate Vs. Bhoop Singh, Advocate

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2005)140PLR122

and the same has been affirmed in appeal.4. It has been found that the landlord is a practicing Advocate in Punjab and Haryana High Court and one of his sons is practicing Advocate though unmarried. It has

State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by the Advocate General Vs. V. Prakasa Ra ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1997(2)ALD(Cri)702; 1997(5)ALT724

ORDERD. Reddeppa Reddi, J.1. The respondent-contemner (hereinafter referred to as the 'contemner') is an Advocate practising in the Courts of District Munsif and Special Judicial First Class Magistrate (Mobile) at Mulug and other

State of A.P. Rep. by the Advocate General, High Court of A.P. Vs. S. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(2)ALT461

as a party-in-person and appeared as counsel in W.P. No. 7467/99 filed by one B. Srinivasa Rao, an advocate. Both these writ petitions were directed against the recommendations made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice, of Members of

Ashok Pandey, Advocate Vs. Satish Chandra Mishra (Presently, Advocate ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (2003)2UPLBEC1294

the nature of quo warranto asking the respondent No. 1 as to how he accepted the appointment as Advocate General for the State of U.P. after being disqualified for the appointment as Judge of the High Court.(ii)

Shri Om Parkash Goyal, Advocate Vs. Shri Ram Krishan Chhokar, Advocate

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1991)99PLR410

ORDERI.S. Tiwana, J.1. Briefly the facts of the case are as follows :The petitioner having purchased House No. 1199, Sector 8-C Chandigarh, has become its owner and the same is under the tenancy of the defendant-respondent...