Solicitor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: solicitor Page 1 of about 13,726 results (0.045 seconds)Advocate Cuddalore; Collector of South Arcot Vs. an Advocate
Court: Chennai
Reported in: 1958CriLJ1321
should be the guiding principle, it is improper for an advocate who held the office of a Public Prosecutor or was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdvocate General of Madras Vs. Amanullakhan, Advocate, Salem 1
Court: Chennai
Reported in: AIR1967Mad162; 1967CriLJ551
Bar, and the proceedings have been initiated by the learned Advocate General under S. 3 of the Contempt of Courts Act,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdvocate-general of Madras Vs. Sri Amanullakhan, Advocate
Court: Chennai
Reported in: (1966)2MLJ219
as a ' breeze ' between the Court and the advocate. But, according to the counter-affidavits, the respondent did not utter
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Advocate-general of Bombay Vs. Haji Ismail Hasham
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1910)12BOMLR274
dispute threatened to become acute, the Commissioner consulted the Corporation Solicitors, as I believe in such cases he is bound .
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Advocate-general of Bombay Vs. Haji Esmail Hassam
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: 5Ind.Cas.213
dispute threatened to become acute, the Commissioner consulted the Corporation Solicitors, as I believe in such cases he is bound to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdvocate-general of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Chennamsetty Chakrapani C.i. of ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Reported in: 1997(3)ALD588; 1997(2)ALD(Cri)92; 1997(3)ALT328; 1997(2)APLJ54; 1997CriLJ3333
fact that a criminal case has been registered against the Advocate Commissioner under S. 353, r/w Section 34 of I.P.C., as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Advocate General of Bombay Vs. Yusufalli Ebrahim
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1922)24BOMLR1060
their defence. I see no reason for their employing separate solicitors and separate counsel. They, however, persisted in this throughout the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdvocate General, High Court of Karnataka Vs. Chidambara and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Reported in: 2004CriLJ493; ILR2003KAR3631
a senior Advocate appearing on his behalf and Sri Manohar, Advocate, representing accused No. 1. He states that as per the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdvocate-general, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad Vs. V. Ramana Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Reported in: AIR1967AP299; 1967CriLJ1470
But when it was posted, after notice to the learned Advocate General, on 6-12-1965, we were invited to dismiss it as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Advocate-general Vs. Sri S. Ramakrishna Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Reported in: 1994(3)ALT387
K. Padmanabham, the Section Officer in the office of the Advocate-General. Rule 5 of die Contempt of Court Rules, framed by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>