Skip to content


Solicit - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: solicit Page 1 of about 304 results (0.114 seconds)
Nov 17 2008 (HC)

Commercial Taxes Officer Vs. Solicit Cosmetics and Fragrance Cosmetics ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: (2009)24VST321(Raj)

vineet kothari j 1 the following common question of law arises in the present four revision petitions filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 03 1982 (HC)

Vijay Pal Singh and ors. Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1983(4)DRJ337

a b rohatgi j 1 this is a petition under art 226 of the constitution of india the petitioners are...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 07 2011 (HC)

Vinay Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

1 heard learned counsel for the parties selected as constable with cisf and joining the force in february 2006 petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 30 1978 (FN)

In Re Primus

Court: US Supreme Court

..... appellant also offered to produce expert testimony to the effect that some measure of solicitation of prospective litigants is necessary in safeguarding the civil liberties of inarticulate economically ..... which may be abstracted from them in distinguishing between primus protected solicitation and ohralik s unprotected solicitation the court lamely declares we have not discarded the common sense .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 08 1945 (FN)

Thomas Vs. Collins

Court: US Supreme Court

..... they include giving aid and direction in organizing campaigns and by his own statement soliciting members generally or in particular instances for his organizations and their affiliated unions he ..... invitation in short the supposedly clear cut distinction between discussion laudation general advocacy and solicitation puts the speaker in these circumstances wholly at the mercy of the varied .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 30 1978 (FN)

Ohralik Vs. Ohio State Bar Assn.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... made of the specific wrongs appellant concedes would justify disciplinary action appellant terms his solicitation pure meaning soliciting and obtaining agreements from carol mcclintock and wanda lou holbert to represent each ..... public defender offices dr 2 103 d 1 footnote 2 3 by benign commercial solicitation i mean solicitation by advice and information that is truthful and that is presented in a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 08 2014 (FN)

Lek Gwee Noi Vs. Humming Flowers and Gifts Pte Ltd.

Court: Singapore Supreme Court

..... her employer her employment agreement contains express post termination non competition and non solicitation covenants 2 in november 2011 the plaintiff resigned from the defendant s employment ..... the restrictive covenant is reasonable in the public interest reasonableness the non solicitation covenant 107 the non solicitation covenant restrains the plaintiff for two years in singapore and malaysia .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 21 1995 (FN)

Florida Bar Vs. Went for It, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... amendments florida bar bar rules prohibiting personal injury lawyers from sending targeted direct mail solicitations to victims and their relatives for 30 days following an accident or disaster the ..... competent legal assistance meanwhile represented and better informed parties or parties who have been solicited in ways more sophisticated and indirect may be at work indeed these parties either .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 26 1993 (FN)

Edenfield Vs. Fane

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a cpa shall not by any direct in person uninvited solicitation solicit an engagement to perform public accounting services where the engagement ..... their professional standards than cpa s who do not solicit or who solicit only by mail or advertisement with respect to the ..... not stand for the proposition that blanket bans on personal solicitation by all types of professionals are constitutional in all .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 27 1990 (FN)

United States Vs. Kokinda

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the government asserts that it is reasonable to restrict access of postal premises to solicitation because solicitation is inherently disruptive of the postal service s business we page 497 u ..... manner regulation the court determined that the government has no significant interest in banning solicitation and that the regulation is not narrowly tailored to accomplish the asserted governmental interest .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //