Solely - Judgment Search Results
Sole Vs. Wyner
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-04-2007
Sole v. Wyner - 06-531 (2007) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2006 SOLE V. WYNER SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Mrs Preeti Sole proprietrix of Kadar Impex and another Vs Mr Vijay Kum ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-23-2025
3rd August 2018. The invoices carry the description of the goods, but no clear conclusion may be drawn solely on such basis as to whether the artistic work was depicted on the packaging of the product concerned.
Smt. Anita Mittal Sole Proprietor of Amog Creations and Amog Creations ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-27-2009
Reported in: 164(2009)DLT418
V.B. Gupta, J.1. Present appeal has been filed by appellants under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short as 'Act'), against judgment dated 28th May, 2007 passed by Additional District Judge, Delhi, vide...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
V.P. Hashumal, Sole Proprietor: Hashumals and anr. Vs. Sri Bombay Halw ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-05-1983
Reported in: (1984)1MLJ200
Padmanabhan, J.1. This original side appeal has been filed by defendants 1 and 2 in C.S. No. 61 of 1975 which is a suit for partition on the file of this Court against the final decree...
The Sole Trustee, Lok Shikshana Trust Vs. the Commissioner of Income T ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-28-1975
Reported in: AIR1976SC10; [1975]101ITR234(SC); (1976)1SCC254; [1976]1SCR461
purpose of 'education' will enable the Courts to supervise the execution of such a trust as one intended solely for educational purposes. The second submission, accepted by the Income-tax Tribunal but rejected by the High Court, implies
Standard Shoe Sole and Mould (India) Limited Vs. Idbi Bank Limited
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-11-2017
In CS No.345 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE STANDARD SHOE SOLE AND MOULD (INDIA) LIMITED versus IDBI BANK LIMITED BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE AND The Hon’ble JUSTICE
Vipin Bansal Sole Proprietor Om Prakash Fatehchand & Co vs.exquisite D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.67/2015 + % VIPIN BANSAL SOLE PROPRIETOR OM PRAKASH FATEHCHAND & CO. Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate. versus (9810152774) 15th November, 2018 ..... Appellant
Gowdappa Biddappa Sole Proprietor of Tvl Anand Granite Works Vs Assist ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 16-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY & Gowdappa Biddappa Sole Proprietor of Tvl Anand Granite Works S F No 747 NA Panchakshi Puram, Hosur, Krishnagiri - 635110. ..Petitioner(s)
Mr Hariharan Sole Proprietor Sree Sathyam International vs Asia Trade ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-11-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 11.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Mr HARIHARAN Sole Proprietor SREE SATHYAM INTERNATIONAL Chennai - 600060. ... Applicant -vs- Asia Trade Link And 4 Others Chennai -
V. Pichandi Sole Proprietor Shri Ambika Match Works Through Its G.P.A. ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-15-2009
Reported in: 2010(1)BomCR394; 2010(112)BomLR114
P.R. Borkar, J.1. By this Appeal from Order the original plaintiff challenges the order dated 7th August, 2004, passed by the Additional District Judge, Aurangabad on application Exh.5 for temporary injunction filed in Regular Civil Suit...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free