- Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
- Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
- Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.
Sole - Judgment Search Results
Sole Vs. Wyner
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-04-2007
Sole v. Wyner - 06-531 (2007) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2006 SOLE
Smt. Anita Mittal Sole Proprietor of Amog Creations and Amog Creations ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-27-2009
Reported in: 164(2009)DLT418
V.B. Gupta, J.1. Present appeal has been filed by appellants under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for...
V.P. Hashumal, Sole Proprietor: Hashumals and anr. Vs. Sri Bombay Halw ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-05-1983
Reported in: (1984)1MLJ200
Padmanabhan, J.1. This original side appeal has been filed by defendants 1 and 2 in C.S. No. 61 of 1975...
The Sole Trustee, Lok Shikshana Trust Vs. the Commissioner of Income T ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-28-1975
Reported in: AIR1976SC10; [1975]101ITR234(SC); (1976)1SCC254; [1976]1SCR461
not entitled to exemption. In reply to that notice the Sole Trustee stated that the above mentioned activities of the trust
Standard Shoe Sole and Mould (India) Limited Vs. Idbi Bank Limited
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-11-2017
COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE STANDARD SHOE SOLE AND MOULD (INDIA) LIMITED versus IDBI BANK LIMITED BEFORE: The
Vipin Bansal Sole Proprietor Om Prakash Fatehchand & Co vs.exquisite D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.67/2015 + % VIPIN BANSAL SOLE PROPRIETOR OM PRAKASH FATEHCHAND & CO. Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh,
V. Pichandi Sole Proprietor Shri Ambika Match Works Through Its G.P.A. ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-15-2009
Reported in: 2010(1)BomCR394; 2010(112)BomLR114
P.R. Borkar, J.1. By this Appeal from Order the original plaintiff challenges the order dated 7th August, 2004, passed by...
Kulpreet Kaur Sole Prop. Govind Travels Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2009
Reported in: 160(2009)DLT64
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. Issue notice. Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate accepts notice. With consent of counsels for parties, the matter...
Sole Hembrom. Vs. the State of Jharkhand.
Court: Jharkhand Ranchi
Decided on: Nov-26-2010
Sessions Case No. 150 of 2003, whereby, the appellant, namely, Sole Hembrom, has been convicted for the offence under Section 302
Jaswant Singh Sole Proprietor M/S D. Sons Enterprises Vs. Jaswant Sing ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
Civil Revision No.3390 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision:-30.07.2013 Jaswant Singh sole Proprietor M/s D. Sons Enterprises ......Petitioner. Versus Jaswant Singh son
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »