Sole - Judgment Search Results
Sole Vs. Wyner
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-04-2007
Sole v. Wyner - 06-531 (2007) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2006 SOLE V. WYNER SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Smt. Anita Mittal Sole Proprietor of Amog Creations and Amog Creations ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-27-2009
Reported in: 164(2009)DLT418
Matched in: Parties Smt. Anita Mittal Sole Proprietor of Amog Creations and Amog Creations Through Its Sole Proprietor Smt. Anita Mittal Vs. Pal Singh Kartar Singh and Shri Rajender Gupta Sole Arbitrator Delhi Hindustani Mercantile Association (Regd.)
V.P. Hashumal, Sole Proprietor: Hashumals and anr. Vs. Sri Bombay Halw ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-05-1983
Reported in: (1984)1MLJ200
Matched in: Parties V.P. Hashumal, Sole Proprietor: Hashumals and anr. Vs. Sri Bombay Halwa House, Represented by Its Partner Gopichand and ors.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Sole Trustee, Lok Shikshana Trust Vs. the Commissioner of Income T ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-28-1975
Reported in: AIR1976SC10; [1975]101ITR234(SC); (1976)1SCC254; [1976]1SCR461
carried on an activity for profit and was not entitled to exemption. In reply to that notice the Sole Trustee stated that the above mentioned activities of the trust were covered by Clause (c) of the objects
Standard Shoe Sole and Mould (India) Limited Vs. Idbi Bank Limited
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-11-2017
In CS No.345 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE STANDARD SHOE SOLE AND MOULD (INDIA) LIMITED versus IDBI BANK LIMITED BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE AND The Hon’ble JUSTICE
Vipin Bansal Sole Proprietor Om Prakash Fatehchand & Co vs.exquisite D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.67/2015 + % VIPIN BANSAL SOLE PROPRIETOR OM PRAKASH FATEHCHAND & CO. Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate. versus (9810152774) 15th November, 2018 ..... Appellant
Gowdappa Biddappa Sole Proprietor of Tvl Anand Granite Works Vs Assist ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 16-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY & Gowdappa Biddappa Sole Proprietor of Tvl Anand Granite Works S F No 747 NA Panchakshi Puram, Hosur, Krishnagiri - 635110. ..Petitioner(s)
V. Pichandi Sole Proprietor Shri Ambika Match Works Through Its G.P.A. ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-15-2009
Reported in: 2010(1)BomCR394; 2010(112)BomLR114
Matched in: Parties V. Pichandi Sole Proprietor Shri Ambika Match Works Through Its G.P.A. Shri Kailash S/O Subhashchand Navandar Vs. G. Chakrapani Match Works Through Its Proprietor C. Elango S/O Chakrapans and ors.
Kulpreet Kaur Sole Prop. Govind Travels Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2009
Reported in: 160(2009)DLT64
Matched in: Parties Kulpreet Kaur Sole Prop. Govind Travels Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Sole Hembrom. Vs. the State of Jharkhand.
Court: Jharkhand Ranchi
Decided on: Nov-26-2010
Additional District & Sessions Judge, Dumka (F.T.C.) in Sessions Case No. 150 of 2003, whereby, the appellant, namely, Sole Hembrom, has been convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free