Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Snapping - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 12 2026

Snap House Llp vs the Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-12-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6464/2026, CM APPL. 31865/2026 SNAP HOUSE LLP .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anuroop P.S., Mr. Surinder Singh Rana and Mr. Aditya Sorout, Advocates.versusTHE GOVT OF


May 12 2026

Snap House Llp vs the Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-12-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6414/2026, CM APPL. 31655/2026 SNAP HOUSE LLP .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anuroop P.S., Mr. Surinder Singh Rana and Mr. Aditya Sorout, Advocates.versusTHE GOVT OF


May 12 2026

Snap House Llp vs the Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-12-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6424/2026, CM APPL. 31678/2026 SNAP HOUSE LLP .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anuroop P.S., Mr. Surinder Singh Rana and Mr. Aditya Sorout, Advocates.versusTHE GOVT OF


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 18 2001

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Snap Tap Machine Accessories ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-18-2001

Reported in: [2002(94)FLR413]; (2002)ILLJ788Mad; (2002)1MLJ132

A.K. Rajan, J.1. The above writ appeal is filed against the judgment of the learned single Judge in W.P. No. 8154 of 1987 dated June 25, 1996.2. In the writ petition, the petitioner challenges the award...


Nov 03 1998

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Snap Services

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-03-1998

Reported in: (1999)(105)ELT447TriDel

1. The assesses in this case were manufacturing Centrifugal Booster Fan and Exhaust hoods. The Collector (Appeals) upheld the classification of these items respectively under sub-heading 8414.80 and 8414.99. He, however, permitted the benefit of Notification...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial