Slot - Judgment Search Results

Mek Slotted Angles (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

1. The application by MEK Slotted Angles is for waiver of deposit of duty of Rs. 42,75,729/- and equivalent penalty. The application by Sabir

Mek Slotted Angles (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)(178)ELT948Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The stay applications filed alongwith these appeals were argued by Shri V.S. Sejpal, learned Chartered Accountant and Shri R.S. Pardeshi learned J.D.R. on 12/05/2003 before the Bench comprising by Hon'ble Member Shri Gowri Shankar and...

Killick Slotted Angels Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1988)(17)LC42Tri(Delhi)

8 appeals. They were, therefore, clubbed together, heard together and hence this common order.2. The appellants, M/s. Killick Slotted Angles Limited, manufactured constructional units under the brand name 'Dexion'. They sold the entire out-put to M/s. Killick

Klick Slotted Angles Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1985)LC350Tri(Delhi)

1. M/s. Klick Slotted Angles Ltd. have filed their revision application dated 28-2-1976 which is against the Order-in-appeal dated 17-11-1975 passed by

Prakash D. Bandiwadekar Vs. Killick Slotted Angles and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1996)IILLJ833Bom

B.N. Srikrishna J. 1. This Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns an order dated 17th December 1990 made by the Industrial Court, Bombay. Dismissing the Petitioners Complaint (ULP) No. 568 of...

Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai - V Vs. Real Slotted Angles Co

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

and that it was only the quantum of penalty which was discretionary. The proprietor of the respondent (Real Slotted Angles Company) appears in person and makes submissions touching his financial condition. He says, he is not aware