Sivan V State - Judgment Search Results

National Insurance Co.Ltd vs Subaida Beevi

Court: Kerala

Admissibility of the scene mahazar prepared by a police officer is considered by this court in several decisions [Sivan v State of Kerala [2012 KHC 629] and Mohanan v State of Kerala [2011(3)KHC 680]. Moreover, the Division Bench of

National Insurance Co.Ltd. vs Beevi Kunju and Others

Court: Kerala

Admissibility of the scene mahazar prepared by a police officer is considered by this court in several decisions [Sivan v State of Kerala [2012 KHC 629] and Mohanan v State of Kerala [2011(3)KHC 680]. Moreover, the Division Bench of

Manik Datta Vs. State of Tripura

Court: Guwahati

entitled to acquittal. Mr. Deb contended relying on the decision of the Kerala High Court in Sivamani alias Sivan v. State of Kerala 1993 Cri LJ 23 and the decision of the Karnataka High Court in Kumar Naik v.

Vanlalven and anr. Vs. State of Manipur

Court: Guwahati

the appellants has relied on a decision of the Kerala High Court in the case of Sivanani Alias Sivan v. State of Kerala, reported in 1993 Cri. LJ 23 and para 11 of the said judgment reads as follows

Lakshmanan Sundaram Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 1990CriLJ1800

a contrary view.18. The next decision of this Court which may be considered is the one in Kunjan Sivan v. State of Kerala, 1969 Ker LT 602. The trial Court convicted the first accused under Section 325, I.P.C., second

Kittunni Subramoniam Vs. Kunhumon and ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 1974CriLJ548

: 1968CriLJ665 .7. There was a difference of view between two learned Judges of this Court in Kunjan Sivan v. State of Kerala :1969 Ker LT 602 regarding the actual decision of the Supreme Court in : [1963]3SCR412 ,

M. Nanikutty Vs. T.C. Mukunda and Others

Court: Kerala

be placed on the decision rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in State of Kerala v. Sivan Pillai reported in [1997 (1) KLT 556]. 16. We have gone through the verdict passed by the Bench

Rajesh.S vs Sri. M.P.Dinesh , Ips,

Court: Kerala

19489/2019 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 19489/2019(I) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/S: RAJESH.S, AGED 50 YEARS S/O SIVAN P.V, CONDUCTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, MUVATTUPUZHA DEPOT (RESIDING AT PRASEEDA BHAVAN, THRIKKALATHOOR P.O.MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-683

Babu @ Radhakrishnan vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

the Court wants to rely upon them as evidence (Mohanan v. State of Kerala, 2011 (4) KLT 59; Sivan @ Siva v. State of Kerala, 2012 KHC 629 and Mujeeb Rahman v. State of Kerala, 2020(3) KHC … primary duty of the doctor is to treat the patients coming before him. As held in Pattipati Venkaiah v. State of A.P., 1985 KHC 700: AIR 1985 SC 1715, a doctor is not at all concerned as to

Ratheesh, C.No. 496/2018 vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

aspects having not been recorded. We also see a reference to State of Karnataka v. Shivana alias Tarkari Sivan [(2014) 8 SCC 913)] to find that Section 164 statement by the victim before a Judicial Magistrate is … 311, indicating that the witness be re- examined for the purpose of securing the ends of justice Teena v. State of Kerala (2022 (2) KLT 593).11. Mannan Shaikh v. State of West Bengal [(2014) 13 SCC 59]examined the