Singly - Judgment Search Results
Learned Single Judge. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No.1235 of 2013. [O&M].Date of Decision:27th August, 2013. Ram Kumar Nain Appellant through Mr.J.P.Dhull, Advocate Versus State of Haryana & ORS.Respondents ***...
“The Learned Single Judge in the Impugned Judgment Has Vs. State of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-22-2013
LPA No.1477 of 2012. ::-1-:: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No.1477 of 2012. [O&M].Date of Decision:22nd May, 2013. Raj Kumar Tokas Appellant through Mr.Yogesh Chaudhary, Advocate Versus...
Single Furnace Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-1998
Reported in: (1998)(103)ELT307TriDel
1. Both these appeals arise from a common order-in-appeal passed by Collector (Appeals) who has confirmed two orders-in-original passed by Dy. Commissioner, denying the Modvat credit and also confirming the imposition of penalty imposed by the...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Single Furnace (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-1999
Reported in: (1999)(106)ELT358TriDel
1. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the impugned order dated 23-4-1997 passed by the Commissioner (Appeal), Chandigarh.2. Shri K.K. Anand, learned Advocate for the appellants submitted that two issues are involved in...
Single Furnace (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2002
Reported in: (2002)(141)ELT244TriDel
1. The appellants are manufacturers of non-alloy ingots of iron and steel. They were working under the Compounded Levy Scheme of Rule 96ZO of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 read with Section 3A of the Central...
Orion Accumulators Private Limited vs the Convener, Single Window Clea ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-05-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 15TH POUSHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 33703 OF 2015 PETITIONER: ORION ACCUMULATORS PRIVATE LIMITED AGED 52...
M/S. J & P Constructions vs District Single Window Clearance Board
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-01-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 36916 OF 2023 PETITIONER: M/S. J & P CONSTRUCTIONS PUNCHAPUTHUSSERY,...
Petlad Bulakhidas Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Raj Singl. and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-01-1958
Reported in: (1958)60BOMLR1271
Chagla, C.J.(1) This petition raises a very short question as to the interpretation of the period of limitation provided under section 33A for the making of an application by the assessee for revision.(2) The appellate Assistant...
P. Ramadas vs the Kerala State Single Window Clearance Board
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-17-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 26TH SRAVANA, 1945 PETITIONER: P. RAMADAS, AGED 59 YEARS, S/O AYYAPPAN, POOVANCHERI HOUSE, VELLUVANGADU SOUTH P.O.,...
Shivakumar S/O Kalyanappa Padashetty Vs. the Disciplinary Authority an ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-21-2006
Reported in: ILR2007KAR427; 2007(3)KarLJ271; 2007(1)KCCRSN18; 2007(1)AIRKarR429
ORDERAnand Byrareddy, J.1. The facts of the case are:The petitioner was working as a Peon-cum-watchman in the Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Yadgiri from the year 2003. It transpires that on 10.12.2003 at about...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free