Simar - Judgment Search Results
Simar Port Private Limited Vs Owners and Parties interested in the Ves ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 16.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY C.S.(Comm Div) No.88 of 2025 & A.No.1706 of 2025 M/s.Simar Port Private Limited Represented by tis Authorized Representative Capt. Nitin Borde Land Survey...
Simar Singh Vs. State of Haryana
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-01-2008
Reported in: (2008)2PLR42
Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J.1. Simar Singh was prosecuted in case FIR No. 53 dated 11.3.1987 registered at Police Station Sadar Rohtak under Sections
Simar Pal Singh Vs. Hakam Singh
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-02-2009
Reported in: (2009)154PLR562
Matched in: Parties Simar Pal Singh Vs. Hakam Singh
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Present: Mr. Simar P.S. Barnala Advocate for Vs. Unknown
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-26-2014
CRM-2158-2014 in CRA-D-901-DB-2013 Subhash & ORS.versus State of Haryana Present: Mr.Simar P.S.Barnala, Advocate for Mr.J.S.Bedi, Advocate for the applicant-appellant No.3, namely, Satbir Singh. Mr.Vikas Verma, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** Prayer in this application is to suspend...
Smt. Simar Jeet Kaur Wife of Sri Jaiveer Singh Vs. State of Uttar Prad ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-06-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)AWC3270
Matched in: Parties Smt. Simar Jeet Kaur Wife of Sri Jaiveer Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh Through Principal Secretary, Home Department Government of U.P.,
Dalbir Singh Vs. Simar Kaur Alias Simro
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-11-2001
Reported in: II(2002)DMC371
Matched in: Parties Dalbir Singh Vs. Simar Kaur Alias Simro
Kulbhushan Churra Senior Commercial Manager, Usha International Limite ...
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Jalandhar, allowing the consumer complaint number 135/2005, filed by the present respondent Simar Kaur was upheld. 2. Brief facts of the case are that as stated by the complainant, she wanted
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free