Silicated - Judgment Search Results
Calcutta Silicate and Chemical Industries and anr. Vs. State of Uttar ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-18-2003
Reported in: [2004]138STC459(All)
State.4. The petitioner is a partnership firm which established a new industrial unit for the manufacture of sodium silicate at its factory situate at Hapur Road, Meerut. The petitioner applied for registration with the Director of Industries
Abhinav Silicate Industry Vs. Chairman, Central Coalfields Ltd. and an ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-30-2003
Reported in: [2003(4)JCR588(Jhr)]
The petitioner's case is that it has established a Unit at Varanasi (U.P.) for production of raw sodium silicate and accordingly the Unit became registered on 3.2.1999 whereafter it became ready for production. Subsequently, it applied for
Silical Metallurgic Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-27-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)KLT120
this appeal is in a narrow campus. The appellant/writ petitioner is a registered dealer and manufacturer of Fero Silicon. He has to import raw-materials like iron and steel from outside State. The schedule to the Kerala Tax
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kiran Silicates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Central Board of Cus. and C. Ex.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-23-1998
Reported in: 1998(102)ELT552(Mad)
ORDERC. Shivappa, J.1. Heard the Counsels for both parties and with their consent, the matter is taken up for final disposal.2. In both these petitions the petitioners have challenged the order passed by Respondent No. 2,...
Reena Silicate Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Gail (India) Ltd. and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-14-2006
Reported in: AIR2006Mad266
Nagapatinam Taluk, Nagapattinam District pending completion of the arbitration proceedings.2. The Applicant firm is a manufacturer of Sodium Silicate having its manufacturing unit at Uthamacholapuram, Narimanan P.O. Nagapattinam District. For the above manufacturing activity, they require natural
National Glass Silicate and Chemical Works Vs. Deputy Commissioner of ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-21-1992
Reported in: (1992)104CTR(All)208; [1992]198ITR733(All)
A.N. Verma J.1. Against a notice issued under Section 226(3) of the Income-tax Act, the petitioner came to this court by way of a petition which was disposed of by our order dated December 17, 1991,...
National Glass Silicate and Chemical Works Vs. Deputy Commissioner of ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-17-1991
Reported in: (1992)105CTR(All)127
ORDERA. N. VARMA, J. :Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R. K. Agrawal, the Standing Counsel representing the respondents, we are disposing of this petition finally with their consent.2. The petitioner is aggrieved...
Soda Silicate and Chemical Works Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-04-1989
Reported in: [1989]179ITR588(P& H)
S. S. Sodhi, J.1. The assessee, Soda Silicate and Chemical Works, Amritsar, derives its income from the manufacture and sale of soda silicate and also by
Sharda Silicate and Chemical Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excis ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-06-1976
Reported in: 1979(4)ELT20(Mad)
which may be briefly stated. The petitioner in each of them is a firm known as M/s. Sharada Silicate and Chemical Industries, Coimbatore. It manufactures and sells sodium silicate on which excise duty is leviable in accordance
Silical Metallurgic Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: May-15-1998
Reported in: (1998)(61)ECC359
appeals, they are taken up together for disposal as per law. The appeal in the case of M/s. Silical Metallurgic Ltd. was heard on 29-4-1998, while the appeal of M/s. Indsil Electrosmelts Ltd. was heard on 30-4-1998.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free