Signed - Judgment Search Results

The Commissioner of Central Vs. Sign and Display Systems

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2006)(110)ECC40

1 revenue has filed this appeal in respect of the oio no 06 2002 dated 28 02 2002 passed by...

Signs India Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1996)(83)ELT665Tri(Chennai)

1 this appeal is against the order of the collector of central excise appeals madras dated 23 12 1991 under...

T. Uttamchan, Prop. JaIn Garments, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Co ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2004CriLJ450; (2003)3MLJ323

orderp d dinakaran j 1 the petitioners in these writ petitions are tenants in the property situated at new no...

The Commissioner, Central Excise Vs. Bombay Neon Signs and Sign Crafts

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)(166)ELT102Tri(Mum.)bai

..... and grinding machines no machinery is installed in m s sign craft illuminated sign board cannot be made without electricity i the average ..... register etc before concluding that m s bombay neon sign and m s sign craft are independent of each other is not correct ..... the departments claim that the assessee was manufacturing only illuminated signs and not non illuminated at all is not substantiated she .....

Commissioner of Sales Tax, Delhi Vs. India Neon Signs

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1981]48STC439(Delhi)

..... intriguing question in this case is thereforee the undoubted fact that even without electricity these signs perform their basic function as advertisement they cannot thereforee easily come within the scope of ..... sales tax categorisation section 20 3 of bengal finance sales tax act 1941 whether neon signs sold by respondent falls under term electrical goods electrical goods cannot be operated without .....

Modern Neon Signs Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1978Delhi568

..... the claim is not justified hire charges for special type of neon sign installed on gate no 1 for 18 weeks 5 claimant claims a ..... 00 for the claim is justified for an dismantling and reinstalling neon sign on amount of rs 300 00 pylon near the railway track 8 ..... the relevant section of the arbitration act section 14 provides for the signing and the filing of the award in court section 15 gives power .....

M/S. Arun Sign Service Vs. Trade Wings Limited

Court: Kolkata

..... civil jurisdiction original side ga2288of 2015 cs142of 2009 m s arun sign service vs trade wings limited before for the applicant the hon ..... on or about 23 february 2010 the applicant company being arun sign pvt ltd was incorporated and a certificate of incorporation dated 23 ..... acquire and take over the partnership business of m s arun sign service being the plaintiff on record as a going concern .....

M/S. Suvidha Sign Studios Pvt. Ltd and Another Vs. Cce, Delhi-i

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

..... fascia building fascia canopy column cladding building cladding spreader facility sign directional sign monolith etc nbsp some of these items are nbsp attached ..... petrol pumps run by them these retail visual identity are sign and visual indicators for the assistance of customers who visit ..... amount was imposed upon the appellants company m s suvidha sign studios pvt ltd besides that a penalty of rs 40 .....

M/S. Arun Sign Works Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court: Kolkata

..... in the high court at calcutta ordinary original civil jurisdiction original side m s arun sign works versus state of west bengal anr before the hon ble justice patherya date 7th ..... to appear in the list on 9th october 2013 all parties to act on a signed photocopy of this order on the usual undertakings patherya j akgoswami

ZoomIn Aura Architectural Signs Pvt. Ltd. Vs. New India Assurance Co. ...

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

..... be referred as district forum in complaint case no 906 of 2002 zoomin aura architectural signs pvt ltd v new india assurance company limited 2 briefly stated the averments made in ..... interior designing decoration work in the name and style of m s zoomin aura architectural signs pvt ltd to earn and his family livelihood and for the said work he is .....