Showing - Judgment Search Results
Lachman Show and ors. Vs. Kalyani Sarkar
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-25-2005
Reported in: 2006(2)CHN58
on this point was Exhibit PD, a certified copy of the relevant entry in the birth register which showed the age of the victim girl. It was argued on behalf of the accused that in the absence
Sangeeta Kumari Show Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-15-2005
Reported in: (2006)2CALLT64(HC),II(2006)DMC471
to support his wife. It includes a capacity to earn and the onus is on the husband to show want of means. Here, it is the evidence of P.W.1 that the O.P. earns Rs. 2000/- or-more from
Smt. Sibrati Show Vs. Santosh Kumar Samaddar and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-28-2013
No.2589 of 2012 With EOS No.31 of 1998 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE SMT. SIBRATI SHOW Versus SANTOSH KUMAR SAMADDAR & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date :28. h June, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Haradhan
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rampukar Show Vs. Bidur Banerjee and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-08-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)CHN652
Company was not liable to give any compensation because the offending vehicle had already been sold to Rampukar Show on 12.12.88 and the authority concerned was duly intimated about such transfer. The O.P./Company, further disclosed in the
Show View Tea Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. West Bengal Tea Board Development Corp ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-05-1980
Reported in: AIR1980Cal269
exceeding the limit, he is, in my opinion, not entitled to be indemnified against them unless he can show that, having regard to all the circumstances under which they were incurred, he was justified in incurring them
Behari Lal Show Vs. Another
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-17-1987
Reported in: 92CWN595
the evidence tendered on behalf of the tenant/opposite party before the court below, Mr. Rej has submitted, unequivocally shows that the lawyer or lawyers who were in-Charge of the defence did not exercise reasonable care and skill
Janardhan Show Vs. the State
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-18-1990
Reported in: 1990CriLJ2449
A.M. Bhattacharjee, J. 1. I agree with the order proposed by my learned brother Nandi, J. in his judgment following hereafter and the revision would accordingly succeed and the revisionist is to be acquitted in accordance...
Hub Lal Show Vs. Prem Raj Lala
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-05-1952
Reported in: AIR1953Cal94
K.C. Das Gupta, J.1. The respondent Premraj Lala filed an application under Section 38 of the Bengal Moneylenders Act in the court of the Subordinate Judge, Howrah. In that application it was stated that the original...
Peare Lal Show Vs. the State
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-11-1960
Reported in: AIR1961Cal531,1961CriLJ462
Mitter, J.1. These two Rules involve a point of some importance in the administration of criminal justice. The petitioners contend that the learned Magistrate's order requiring them to attend test identification parades violates their fundamental right...
Ganeshlal Show and anr. Vs. Asansole Municipality and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-02-1962
Reported in: 1963CriLJ658
my attention to the provisions of 'written warranty' in Sub-section (2) of Section 19 for the purpose of showing that these provisions can apply only to the master and not to the servant and that, therefore, a
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free