Show Cause - Judgment Search Results

Lachman Show and ors. Vs. Kalyani Sarkar

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2006(2)CHN58

on this point was Exhibit PD, a certified copy of the relevant entry in the birth register which showed the age of the victim girl. It was argued on behalf of the accused that in the absence

Sangeeta Kumari Show Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2006)2CALLT64(HC),II(2006)DMC471

to support his wife. It includes a capacity to earn and the onus is on the husband to show want of means. Here, it is the evidence of P.W.1 that the O.P. earns Rs. 2000/- or-more from

Smt. Sibrati Show Vs. Santosh Kumar Samaddar and ors.

Court: Kolkata

No.2589 of 2012 With EOS No.31 of 1998 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE SMT. SIBRATI SHOW Versus SANTOSH KUMAR SAMADDAR & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date :28. h June, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Haradhan

Rampukar Show Vs. Bidur Banerjee and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2004(1)CHN652

Company was not liable to give any compensation because the offending vehicle had already been sold to Rampukar Show on 12.12.88 and the authority concerned was duly intimated about such transfer. The O.P./Company, further disclosed in the … Finance Company continued as the registered owner of the vehicle and also took the plea that the accident caused due to negligence on the part of the victim Hansi Banerjee.4. In the impugned judgment, the learned Tribunal

Show View Tea Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. West Bengal Tea Board Development Corp ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1980Cal269

exceeding the limit, he is, in my opinion, not entitled to be indemnified against them unless he can show that, having regard to all the circumstances under which they were incurred, he was justified in incurring them … if he finds that the fund provided by the Court is not sufficient, it is his duty to cause the matter to be brought before the Court, so that, if it sees fit, it may increase it,

Behari Lal Show Vs. Another

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 92CWN595

the evidence tendered on behalf of the tenant/opposite party before the court below, Mr. Rej has submitted, unequivocally shows that the lawyer or lawyers who were in-Charge of the defence did not exercise reasonable care and skill

Janardhan Show Vs. the State

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1990CriLJ2449

the possessor cannot prove 'that the railway property came to his possession lawfully'.3. 'Possession', an expression which has caused many headaches to the Jurists and Judges throughout the ages, is a word of such protean, varied and

Hub Lal Show Vs. Prem Raj Lala

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1953Cal94

K.C. Das Gupta, J.1. The respondent Premraj Lala filed an application under Section 38 of the Bengal Moneylenders Act in the court of the Subordinate Judge, Howrah. In that application it was stated that the original...

Peare Lal Show Vs. the State

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1961Cal531,1961CriLJ462

Mitter, J.1. These two Rules involve a point of some importance in the administration of criminal justice. The petitioners contend that the learned Magistrate's order requiring them to attend test identification parades violates their fundamental right...

Ganeshlal Show and anr. Vs. Asansole Municipality and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1963CriLJ658

shop is not satisfactory; besides the oral testimony of the Food Inspector there is no other evidence to show that the petitioners are the proprietors of the shop. It was quite easy indeed for the prosecution to … that the non-compliance with the requirements of Sub-section (7) of Section 10 is a serious irregularity which has caused material prejudice to the accused. Another case is reported in State of Mysore v. Udipi Co-operative Milk Society