Should - Year 2002 - Judgments

Jan 01 2002 (TRI)

Ballarpur Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-01-2002

Reported in: (2002)(141)ELT182TriDel

..... outside and used for wrapping reams in their factory the weight of the wrapping paper should be included in the total weight of the ream for the purpose of calculating and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 10 2002 (TRI)

Orient Colour Crafts Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: May-10-2002

Reported in: (2002)(104)LC757Tri(Chennai)

..... import and if they still felt that it is covered under the project import they should apply to the proper officer there was no further correspondence application for the registration there .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 2002 (TRI)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Vinay Kumar

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-14-2002

Reported in: (2002)(145)ELT467Tri(Mum.)bai

..... in the process is directly applicable to the present case the entire quantity of inputs should be considered to have been used in the manufacture of electrolytic tin plate following the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 2002 (TRI)

Jog Engineering Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-14-2002

Reported in: (2003)(160)ELT460Tri(Mum.)bai

..... the notification which provides that the goods in question for which exemption is being claimed should be imported by a person who has been awarded a contract for the construction of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 2002 (TRI)

Cc Vs. K.R. Steel Union Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-14-2002

Reported in: (2002)(104)LC1056Tri(Mum.)bai

..... in the process is directly applicable to the present case the entire quantity of inputs should be considered to have been used in the manufacture of electrolytic tin plate following the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 2002 (TRI)

Guljag Industries Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-14-2002

Reported in: (2002)(144)ELT336TriDel

..... two conditions must be fulfilled viz i there must be movable goods and ii they should meet the marketability test as goods he observed that these tests are not fulfilled by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 12 2002 (TRI)

Cce Vs. Oripol Industries, Utkal

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-12-2002

Reported in: (2003)(88)ECC239

..... therefore the interpretation given to section 35 1 as it stood before 11 10 82 should be given to the present section 35a 3 in air 7961 ap 324 a division .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 13 2002 (TRI)

Karmayogi Dyeing Pvt. Ltd. and Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-13-2002

Reported in: (2002)(105)LC130Tri(Mum.)bai

..... that it is the job worker being the manufacturer on whom the primary duty liability should fall however as the bench in itc ltd pointed out it was by the judgment .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 08 2002 (TRI)

Kwality Zipper Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-08-2002

Reported in: (2002)(145)ELT296TriDel

..... had been rightly clubbed from that date 8 the argument of the counsel that amalgamation should be deemed to had been effective from 24 12 99 when the order of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 16 2002 (TRI)

Tridoss Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-16-2002

Reported in: (2003)(151)ELT334Tri(Mum.)bai

..... advanced assuming that to be the case which resulted in the lowering of the price should justify not accepting it the assessable value under section 4 was at the relevant time .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Should - Judgment Search Results