Skip to content


Should - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: should Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 353 results (0.286 seconds)
Jan 03 2000 (TRI)

Advance Mechanical Works Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-03-2000

Reported in: (2001)(134)ELT475Tri(Mum.)bai

..... be eligible under that notification in the later named notification the condition was that they should not bear the name of such other person since the crankshafts bore the brand name .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 01 2000 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Charak Pharmaceuticals

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-01-2000

Reported in: (2001)(127)ELT748Tri(Mum.)bai

..... the goods sold is known and there is no reason as to why that cost should not be applied we are unable to uphold the commissioner appeals order we accept the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 02 2000 (TRI)

Divyalaxmi Plastic Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-02-2000

Reported in: (2000)(71)ECC349

..... only point made at the personal hearing before the assistant collector was that the matter should be kept pending till the appeal is decided in the facts of this case therefore .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 02 2000 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Agarwal Steel Re-rolling Mills

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-02-2000

Reported in: (2001)(130)ELT869TriDel

..... point of law arises therefore the reference application of the applicant is allowed the case should be referred to the hon ble m p high court at jabalpur for their considered .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 01 2000 (TRI)

Micro Stretch Elastomers Pvt. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jun-01-2000

Reported in: (2001)(134)ELT477Tri(Chennai)

..... at this stage ld dr submits that the revenue involvement being heavy some time limit should be prescribed for this de novo consideration in view of the heavy revenue involvement it .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 01 2000 (TRI)

Bettonville Diamond Equipment Vs. C.C.E.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jun-01-2000

Reported in: (2000)(70)ECC844

..... located within the vizag export promotion zone on matters of export compliances the development commissioner should have been first consulted before issue of show cause notice in terms of board s .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 02 2000 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Maruti Udyog Limited

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-02-2000

Reported in: (2000)(120)ELT382TriDel

..... appellants that in case their contentions are not accepted to the full extent then they should be given the benefit of this error i e setting off the excess against the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 01 2000 (TRI)

Gujarat Machinery Mfgrs. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-01-2000

Reported in: (2000)(71)ECC351

..... central excise rules 1944 existed during the relevant period or the jurisdictional assistant collector commissioner should submit the refund application received by him to the principal collector for relaxation provided therein .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 31 2000 (TRI)

Jamuna Auto Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-31-2000

Reported in: (2000)(120)ELT441TriDel

..... no 179 13 95 cx 8 dated 29 2 1996 which advises that the credit should not be denied where the bill of entry is in the name of head office .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 07 2000 (TRI)

Honda Siel Power Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-07-2000

Reported in: (2000)(119)ELT706TriDel

..... such a case modvat credit could not be claimed under rule 57a instead the assessees should avail themselves of the provisions of rule 173h or rule 173l which related to retention .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //