Should - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: should Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 343 results (0.214 seconds)M/S. Punjab Woolcombers Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-01-2001
..... registration certificate their contention is that requirement under central excise rules is that the dealer should be registered it is only the trade notice issued by the chandigarh collectorate which says .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Etah Steels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce, Kanpur
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2001
..... although the furnace capacity is shown in the invoice as 3 m t the capacity should be taken as 2 5 m t they prayed that the capacity may be re .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSyrian Arab Airlines Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-09-2001
Reported in: (2001)(133)ELT625Tri(Mum.)bai
..... ld counsel appearing along with shri rajesh shah advocate submitted that the issue of refund should be governed under the indian contract act where it is the liability of a person .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise and Vs. M/S. Asian Tubes Limited
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-09-2001
..... said that where the procedural lapses were likely to result in fraud or collusion they should not be condoned no contest is made of the cited judgements 3 i have seen .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Dyestuff Industries Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Kandla
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-09-2001
Reported in: (2002)(149)ELT760Tri(Mum.)bai
..... to be referred and does not press the other questions this is whether the tribunal should not have held that the original claim had been kept alive by the appellant by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Vishwakarma Alloys Ltd. Vs. Cce, Chandigarh
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2001
..... non intimation of closing stock is a procedural lapse and the substantive benefit of abatement should not be denied for procedural sic in this regard it is observed that in para .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Dynamatic Technologies Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Centra ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Mar-08-2001
..... classifiable under heading 84 13 as has been done in the impugned order or it should be classified under 87 08 as parts of tractors as claimed by the party when .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCce, Chandigarh Vs. M/S Mahaan Dairies
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2001
Reported in: (2001)(133)ELT461TriDel
..... connection between the product and another person namely m s mfl and therefore mahaan tastemaker should be considered to be a brand name belonging to m s mfl in which event .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagson International Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Mar-08-2001
Reported in: (2001)(132)ELT247Tri(Chennai)
..... pvt ltd v uoi 1996 86 e l t 15 bom only thereafter the authority should consider their plea for concessional rate as claimed under notification no 196 89 cus 3 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs. Jayantri Plastics Vs. Cce, Meerut-i
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2001
..... request and as the law provided for taking cognizance of such a request the matter should have been decided after following the principles of natural justice i am passing no orders .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial