Short - Judgment Search Results

Short Vs. Ness Produce Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

SHORT v. NESS PRODUCE CO. - 385 U.S. 537 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court SHORT v. NESS PRODUCE CO., 385

Tate Vs. Short

Court: US Supreme Court

Tate v. Short - 401 U.S. 395 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Tate v. Short, 401 U.S. 395 (1971) Tate v. Short

Texaco, Inc. Vs. Short

Court: US Supreme Court

Texaco, Inc. v. Short - 454 U.S. 516 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Texaco, Inc. v. Short, 454 U.S. 516 (1982) Texaco, Inc.

“The Short Point Argued by the Learned Counsel Vs. Rajinder Singh an ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

conspectus of the observations made therein. The relevant portion of the Supreme Court order is extracted hereunder:- “The short point argued by the learned counsel for the appellant is that the 4th Pay Commission Report had not

“a Short Reply by Way of an Affidavit Dated 22.04.2014 of Deputy Vs. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

at Police Station Dharamgarh, District Sangrur. On 22.04.2014, the following order was passed by this Court :- “A short reply by way of an affidavit dated 22.04.2014 of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division, Dirba has been

The Short Grievance of the Petitioners in the Vs. Bhagwan Sarup @ Bhag ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Kumar Mohinder 2014.07.30 12:13 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh CWP No.12939 of 2014 [2].The short grievance of the petitioners in the instant writ petition is that their land, particulars whereof are tabulated in

Short Pile Construction Company Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 76(1998)DLT189

Matched in: Parties Short Pile Construction Company Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Short Bros. (P.) Ltd., in Voluntary Liquidation by Its Liquidator, A.K ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1964)1MLJ66

for interpretation of Section 2(6-A), (c) of the Indian Income-tax Act. It arises in the following manner. M/s. Short Bros. (P.) Ltd., own certain coffee estates in Salem District. The company sold all of its assets on

Short Brothers (P.) Ltd. Vs. First Income-tax Officer, Salem.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1964]51ITR315(Mad)

of section 2 (6A) (c) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. It arises in the following manner. Messrs. Short Brothers (Private) Ltd. own certain coffee estates in Salem District. The company sold all of its assets on

Short Prints Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1992)(58)ELT351TriDel

be 1000 ft.".Thus, the 16 mm format of the subject film in 35 mm format will measure considerably shorter than the length of 603.90 metres of the latter, 241.56 metres to be precise, adopting the above formula.