Short - Judgment Search Results

Tate Vs. Short

Court: US Supreme Court

- 401 U.S. 395 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Tate v. Short, 401 U.S. 395 (1971) Tate v. Short No. 324 Argued

Short Vs. Ness Produce Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

NESS PRODUCE CO., 385 U.S. 537 (1967) 385 U.S. 537 SHORT ET AL. v. NESS PRODUCE CO. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

Texaco, Inc. Vs. Short

Court: US Supreme Court

Inc. v. Short, 454 U.S. 516 (1982) Texaco, Inc. v. Short No. 80-965 Argued October 6, 1981 Decided January 12, 1982

The Brig Short Staple and Cargo Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

might be, was not imputable to the owners of the Short Staple. It has been contended that, during the separation of

Oregon Short Line Ry. Co. Vs. Skottowe

Court: US Supreme Court

Oregon for Wasco County by Jane Skottowe against the Oregon Short Line and Utah Northern Railway Company for personal injuries alleged

Oregon Short Line and Utah Northern Ry. Co. Vs. Conlin

Court: US Supreme Court

Conlin - 162 U.S. 498 (1896) U.S. Supreme Court Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Ry. Co. v. Conlin, 162 U.S.

Short Bros. (P.) Ltd., in Voluntary Liquidation by Its Liquidator, A.K ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1964)1MLJ66

a sum of Rs. 4,11,700 as the tax due. The short contention of the petitioner, the Liquidator representing the company, is

Short Brothers (P.) Ltd. Vs. First Income-tax Officer, Salem.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1964]51ITR315(Mad)

a sum of Rs. 4,11,700 as the tax due. The short contention of the petitioner, the liquidator representing the company, is

“The Short Point Argued by the Learned Counsel Vs. Rajinder Singh an ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

portion of the Supreme Court order is extracted hereunder:- The short point argued by the learned counsel for the appellant is

“a Short Reply by Way of an Affidavit Dated 22.04.2014 of Deputy Vs. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

the following order was passed by this Court :- A short reply by way of an affidavit dated 22.04.2014 of Deputy