Shoring - Judgment Search Results

Parklane Hosiery Co., Inc. Vs. Shore

Court: US Supreme Court

Parklane Hosiery Co., Inc. v. Shore - 439 U.S. 322 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Parklane Hosiery Co., Inc. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322 (1979)

County of Cass Vs. Shores

Court: US Supreme Court

County of Cass v. Shores - 95 U.S. 375 (1877) U.S. Supreme Court County of Cass v. Shores, 95 U.S. 375 (1877) County

County of Macon Vs. Shores

Court: US Supreme Court

County of Macon v. Shores - 97 U.S. 272 (1877) U.S. Supreme Court County of Macon v. Shores, 97 U.S. 272 (1877) County

Kewal Krishan Shoree Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

..... PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 5979/2010 & CM No.11782/2010 KEWAL KRISHAN SHOREE ..... PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 5980/2010 & CM No.11784/2010 BALRAJ KUMAR

South Shore Ice Creams Pvt. Ltd., vs the Revenue Divisional Officer,

Court: Kerala

FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 24620 OF 2024 PETITIONER: SOUTH SHORE ICE CREAMS PVT. LTD., KADVANTHRA,REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, DR. RAHUL ANTONY SIMON, PIN - 682020 BY ADV C.K.SHERIN

South Shore Ice Creams Pvt Ltd. vs the Thasildhar. (L.R)

Court: Kerala

THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 12TH SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 22334 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: SOUTH SHORE ICE CREAMS PVT LTD. KADAVANTHRA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682020 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY AND MANAGER, BY ADVS.

South Shore Ice Creams Pvt Ltd Vs. District Collector, Ernakulam

Court: Kerala

17TH DAY OF JULY 2013 26TH ASHADHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 11062 of 2013 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS: ---------- 1. SOUTH SHORE ICE CREAMS PVT LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT 28/3030, CHERUPARAMBATH ROAD,

TuticorIn New Shore Slum Dwellers Welfare Association, Represented by ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1991)95MLJ1

ORDERMishra, J.1. This petition has been filed in public interest by Tuticorin New Shore Slum Dwellers Welfare Association represented by its Vice President. They have questioned the validity of a notice of

Shore to Shore Mis :pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2006)(109)ECC189

1. There are two applications before us, one praying for condonation of delay of 78 days involved in the filing of the appeal and the other seeking waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery in respect...

Shore to Shore Mis Private Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2007)(114)ECC118

1. In the impugned order, the Commissioner (Appeals) affirmed the order of the lower authority demanding Service Tax of Rs. 8,50,215/- from the appellants on "Consulting Engineer's Service" for the period May, 2002 to July, 2004...