Shore - Judgment Search Results

Parklane Hosiery Co., Inc. Vs. Shore

Court: US Supreme Court

Parklane Hosiery Co., Inc. v. Shore - 439 U.S. 322 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Parklane Hosiery Co., Inc. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322 (1979)

County of Cass Vs. Shores

Court: US Supreme Court

County of Cass v. Shores - 95 U.S. 375 (1877) U.S. Supreme Court County of Cass v. Shores, 95 U.S. 375 (1877) County

County of Macon Vs. Shores

Court: US Supreme Court

County of Macon v. Shores - 97 U.S. 272 (1877) U.S. Supreme Court County of Macon v. Shores, 97 U.S. 272 (1877) County

Kewal Krishan Shoree Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

..... PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 5979/2010 & CM No.11782/2010 KEWAL KRISHAN SHOREE ..... PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 5980/2010 & CM No.11784/2010 BALRAJ KUMAR

South Shore Ice Creams Pvt. Ltd., vs the Revenue Divisional Officer,

Court: Kerala

FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 24620 OF 2024 PETITIONER: SOUTH SHORE ICE CREAMS PVT. LTD., KADVANTHRA,REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, DR. RAHUL ANTONY SIMON, PIN - 682020 BY ADV C.K.SHERIN

South Shore Ice Creams Pvt Ltd. vs the Thasildhar. (L.R)

Court: Kerala

THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 12TH SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 22334 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: SOUTH SHORE ICE CREAMS PVT LTD. KADAVANTHRA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682020 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY AND MANAGER, BY ADVS.

South Shore Ice Creams Pvt Ltd Vs. District Collector, Ernakulam

Court: Kerala

17TH DAY OF JULY 2013 26TH ASHADHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 11062 of 2013 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS: ---------- 1. SOUTH SHORE ICE CREAMS PVT LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT 28/3030, CHERUPARAMBATH ROAD,

TuticorIn New Shore Slum Dwellers Welfare Association, Represented by ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1991)95MLJ1

ORDERMishra, J.1. This petition has been filed in public interest by Tuticorin New Shore Slum Dwellers Welfare Association represented by its Vice President. They have questioned the validity of a notice of

Shore to Shore Mis :pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2006)(109)ECC189

Matched in: Parties Shore to Shore Mis :pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Shore to Shore Mis Private Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2007)(114)ECC118

Matched in: Parties Shore to Shore Mis Private Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise