Shifting Use - Judgment Search Results
Workmen Shift Incharge Sub-station Vs. Presiding Officer, Addl. Indust ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-13-1979
Reported in: AIR1980SC511; [1980(41)FLR51]; 1980LabIC289; (1980)ILLJ461SC; (1980)1SCC683; 1980(12)LC6(SC)
employs various workmen under different categories. One of these categories, working in the distribution centers, is known as shift in-charge. These workmen by qualification are matriculates with ITI certificates. There are three categories which are more or
Lift and Shift India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Warehousing Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
Customs Public Notice No.dated 29th January, 1996 ordering the act of closure of operations at Kalamboli CFS and shifting of examination and carting of export containers from Kalamboli to D-Node did not make the contact impossible of … Contract. Further, CWC refused to grant the difference of the price hike of diesel, oil and petroleum products used by the... Petitioner for transportation.5. By letters dated 19th November 1996, 27th December 1996, 3rd February 1997 and
Lift and Shift India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Container Corporation of India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2007
Reported in: 2007(4)ARBLR286(Delhi); 2007(99)DRJ499
the market- and to appreciate the worth of all that he sees upon a view. But he cannot use his special knowledge so as to provide evidence on behalf of the defendants which they have not chosen
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Lift and Shift Vs. Commr. of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Oct-23-2007
1. Heard both sides. Shri Kartik Kurmy, ld. Counsel appearing for the appellants states that under the impugned order, the authorities below have decided that the service rendered by the appellants is classifiable under the Cargo...
Abhishek Kumar Garg Vs. Aggarwal Goods Shifting Pvt. Ltd. and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-12-2012
27-12-2010. There are also no substantial grounds as why Ex.A3 was given in the name of Agarwal Goods Shifting Private Limited whereas Ex.B1 is in the name of Agarwal Goods Movers and Packers Private Limited. When it
M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Re Shifting of Industries from Resident ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-30-2000
Reported in: 2000(8)SCALE361; (2002)9SCC534
this Court to modify the order dated 8th September, 1999 and wanting time up to March 2004 for shifting of the industries. It is also prayed in the application that the industrial units functioning in the residential … Master Plan is formulated by the Government. It provides the manner in which the land is to be used. The Government is entitled to stop the mis-user if it so desires. By order dated 8th September, 1999
Took Place in the Year 1984 Due to Which He Had to Shift to the Vs. De ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
been issued; (ii) he took loan from the appellant- Corporation in order to start the business after his shifting to Punjab, and (iii) he fulfills all the terms and conditions laid down under the Central Interest Subsidy
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free