Shall - Judgment Search Results
“this Order Shall Dispose of Cwp No.10941 of 2010 and Vs. Chander Sh ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
and others v. State of Haryana and others decided on 26.4.2012. The order reads thus :- “This order shall dispose of CWP No.10941 of 2010 and other connected petitions, list of which is appended as Annexure-A. The
“this Order Shall Dispose of Cwp No.10941 of 2010 and Vs. Smt. Santo ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
and others v. State of Haryana and others decided on 26.4.2012. The order reads thus :- “This order shall dispose of CWP No.10941 of 2010 and other connected petitions, list of which is appended as Annexure-A. The
Shall Have No Objection for Grant of Divorce to Amandeep Kaur Vs. Stat ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-12-2014
No.4 to 7. Mr. Simranjeet Singh Sarwara, Advocate for respondent No.8. .... TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.(ORAL). This order shall dispose of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482
18-section briefs on any result in this list
This Order Shall Dispose of the Present Petition Filed Under Vs. State ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-02-2014
Present:- Mr.Sarju Puri, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Mr.Vaibhav Sharma, D.A.G., Punjab *** TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. J (Oral) This order shall dispose of the present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.seeking the concession of pre-arrest bail to petitioner No.2
Shekhar Gaur Vs. Shall Kanwar
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-24-2007
Reported in: RLW2007(3)Raj2161
Matched in: Parties Shekhar Gaur Vs. Shall Kanwar
“10. the Mandate Shall Be therefore That the Respondents Vs. Ashwani ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-15-2013
others decided on 2.8.2011 and connected cases in which the following directions have been given: “10. The mandate shall be, therefore, that the respondents No.1 to 4 provide temporary electricity connections to all the petitioners on the
“1. the Milk Dairy Booth Shall Continue to RemaIn in Vs. Huda and or ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
Hihg Court Chandigarh CWP No.1224 of 2001 ::-2-:: interim protection with the following directions:-“1. The milk dairy booth shall continue to remain in possession and occupation of the appellants who may use the same in accordance with
Station for Investigation. He Shall Also Appear as and when Vs. State ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-01-2014
Mr.Amandeep Singh, AAG Haryana. Mr.Karan Singh, Advocate for the complainant. ******* TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J. (Oral) This order shall dispose of CRM M No.37347 of 2013 as also CRM M No.42681 of 2013 as both the petitioners
“33 (5) No Appeal Preferred by an Assessee to an Appellate Authority ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-30-2014
notified on 20.03.2009 reads as under:- “33 (5) No appeal preferred by an assessee to an appellate authority shall be entertained unless it is filed within sixty days from the date of the order appealed against. The
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free