Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Shall - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 20 2012

“this Order Shall Dispose of Cwp No.10941 of 2010 and Vs. Chander Sh ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-20-2012

and others v. State of Haryana and others decided on 26.4.2012. The order reads thus :- “This order shall dispose of CWP No.10941 of 2010 and other connected petitions, list of which is appended as Annexure-A. The


Dec 20 2012

“this Order Shall Dispose of Cwp No.10941 of 2010 and Vs. Smt. Santo ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-20-2012

and others v. State of Haryana and others decided on 26.4.2012. The order reads thus :- “This order shall dispose of CWP No.10941 of 2010 and other connected petitions, list of which is appended as Annexure-A. The


Feb 12 2014

Shall Have No Objection for Grant of Divorce to Amandeep Kaur Vs. Stat ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-12-2014

No.4 to 7. Mr. Simranjeet Singh Sarwara, Advocate for respondent No.8. .... TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.(ORAL). This order shall dispose of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 02 2014

This Order Shall Dispose of the Present Petition Filed Under Vs. State ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-02-2014

Present:- Mr.Sarju Puri, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Mr.Vaibhav Sharma, D.A.G., Punjab *** TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. J (Oral) This order shall dispose of the present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.seeking the concession of pre-arrest bail to petitioner No.2


May 24 2007

Shekhar Gaur Vs. Shall Kanwar

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: May-24-2007

Reported in: RLW2007(3)Raj2161

Matched in: Parties Shekhar Gaur Vs. Shall Kanwar


Feb 15 2013

“10. the Mandate Shall Be therefore That the Respondents Vs. Ashwani ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-15-2013

others decided on 2.8.2011 and connected cases in which the following directions have been given: “10. The mandate shall be, therefore, that the respondents No.1 to 4 provide temporary electricity connections to all the petitioners on the


Jan 15 2014

“1. the Milk Dairy Booth Shall Continue to RemaIn in Vs. Huda and or ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-15-2014

Hihg Court Chandigarh CWP No.1224 of 2001 ::-2-:: interim protection with the following directions:-“1. The milk dairy booth shall continue to remain in possession and occupation of the appellants who may use the same in accordance with


Apr 01 2014

Station for Investigation. He Shall Also Appear as and when Vs. State ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-01-2014

Mr.Amandeep Singh, AAG Haryana. Mr.Karan Singh, Advocate for the complainant. ******* TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J. (Oral) This order shall dispose of CRM M No.37347 of 2013 as also CRM M No.42681 of 2013 as both the petitioners


May 30 2014

“33 (5) No Appeal Preferred by an Assessee to an Appellate Authority ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-30-2014

notified on 20.03.2009 reads as under:- “33 (5) No appeal preferred by an assessee to an appellate authority shall be entertained unless it is filed within sixty days from the date of the order appealed against. The


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial