Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Settlement - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 20 2002

Director of Settlements, Andhra Pradesh and ors. Vs. M.R. Apparao and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-20-2002

Reported in: AIR2002SC1598; 2002(6)BomCR367; JT2002(3)SC304; 2002(3)SCALE122; (2002)4SCC638; [2002]2SCR661

was promulgated to restrict the interim payments payable to the estate-holder till the termination by the Director of Settlement. The aforesaid Ordinance was replaced by Act 3 of 1971 on 16.1.1971, amending Sections 41, 44, 50 and


Oct 16 1986

Chief Settlement Commissioner (Rural) Punjab and anr. Vs. Ram Singh an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-16-1986

Reported in: AIR1987SC1834; (1987)1SCC612

undertaken in the context of the excess allotment made to them (hereafter called the allottees). Ultimately the Chief Settlement Commissioner by his order dated May 4, 1963 cancelled the allotment of the excess land (11 S.A. 2


Apr 05 1968

Chief Settlement Commissioner, Rehabilitation Department, Punjab and o ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-05-1968

Reported in: AIR1969SC33; (1968)70PLR1082; [1968]3SCR655

Managing Officer by his order dated September 18, 1961. The three respondents preferred an appeal before the Assistant Settlement Commissioner and a revision petition before the Chief Settlement Commissioner Punjab but the appeal and the revision petition


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 29 1961

The Additional Settlement Commissioner Vs. Yeshwant Madhao Mahajan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-29-1961

Reported in: AIR1966SC1971; [1962]Supp1SCR710

by the Compensation Officer and the order of the Compensation Officer was confirmed in appeal by the Additional Settlement Commissioner. Mahajan then applied to the High Court of Judicature at Nagpur under Art. 226 of the Constitution


Apr 27 1962

The Regional Settlement Commissioner Vs. Sunderdas Bhasin

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-27-1962

Reported in: AIR1963SC181; [1963]2SCR534

shop. He claimed Rs. 12,000/- for the house and Rs. 8,000/- for the shop as compensation. The Additional Settlement Commission allowed his claim to the extent of Rs. 6,674/- for the house and Rs. 6,120/- for the


Sep 08 2008

Director of Settlements and ors. Vs. Lingareddy Ramakrishna Reddy and ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-08-2008

Reported in: 2008(6)ALD566; 2008(6)ALT164

21218 of 1995, wherein the said writ petition filed seeking writ of prohibition restraining' the first respondent-Director of Settlements from proceeding further with the suo motu enquiry pursuant to the notice dated 08.04.1995, was allowed.2. Heard the


Dec 12 2006

Chief Settlement Officer and ors. Vs. Ladu Ram and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Dec-12-2006

Reported in: 2007(1)WLN134

Against this order one Ladu Ram filed an appeal in the Court of Additional District Collector cum Authorised Settlement Commissioner, Sri Ganganagar. He vide his order dated 29.12.2005 closed the proceedings of the appeal inter alia on


Jul 14 2004

income-tax Settlement Commission and ors. Vs. Netaji Chandra Rarhi and ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-14-2004

Reported in: (2005)1CALLT247(HC),(2005)193CTR(Cal)430,[2004]271ITR514(Cal)

senior counsel for the appellant, had pointed out that the law with regard to the power of the Settlement Commission in waiving interest is settled in the case of Anjum Mohammed Hussain Ghaswala, In re : [1998]230ITR1(SC)


Aug 29 2004

income Tax Settlement Commission and ors. Vs. Netai Chandra Rarhi and ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-29-2004

Reported in: [2005]142TAXMAN446(Cal)

ORDER BY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONPower to reviseSettlement Commission has no power to exercise the power of rectification under section 154, except in


Jul 23 2014

Daily Lok Adalat Bench No.2 Vs. Unknown

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-23-2014

over and above the amount awarded by the Tribunal is allowed to the appellant in full and final settlement of the claim, subject to all just exceptions. Two months' time is allowed to the Insurance Company to


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial