Settle - Judgment Search Results
Baltimore and O. S.W. R. Co. Vs. Settle
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-13-1922
Baltimore & O. S.W. R. Co. v. Settle - 260 U.S. 166 (1922) U.S. Supreme Court Baltimore & O. S.W. R. Co. v. Settle, 260 U.S.
The Authorized Claim Settle Manager vs Venkatesh T M
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 2356 OF 2025 (GM-AC) BETWEEN:1. THE AUTHORIZED CLAIM SETTLE MANAGERHDFC GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD, ERGO NO.25/1, 2ND FLOOR, SHANKARANARAYANA BUILDING, M G ROAD, BANGALORE-01 NOW REP BY
The Authorised Claim Settle Manager vs Smt Sukanya
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 28311 OF 2025 (GM-AC) BETWEEN: THE AUTHORISED CLAIM SETTLE MANAGER SBI GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD RAILWAY PLOT FARM ROAD, BANGALORE 560020 NOW REP BY SBI GENERAL LINSURANCE
18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Authorized Claim Settle Manager vs Smt Geethamma
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-14-2025
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN WRIT PETITION NO. 29845 OF 2024 (GM-AC) BETWEEN: THE AUTHORIZED CLAIM SETTLE MANAGER 2ND FLOOR, SVR COMPLEX HOSUR MAIN ROAD BENGLAURU-560 068 NOW REPRESENTED BY THE REGIONAL MANAGER ASHWIN K.
“9. by This Time It Is Well Settled That Powers Under Section 319 Cr ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
P1), which, in substance, is as under (paras 9 to 13) :-“9. By this time, it is well settled that powers under Section 319 Cr.PC are extra ordinary in nature and thus must be exercised very sparingly
“In View of the Settled Position of Law Laid Down in Vs. State of Pu ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
connected petitions decided on 02.12.2013, while declining to interfere, the Bench observed as under: “In view of the settled position of law laid down in Aleque Padamsee's case (supra) and Sakiri Vasu's case (supra).there is no reason
“In View of the Settled Position of Law Laid Down in Aleque Vs. Stat ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-31-2014
the extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C., it had been held in the following terMs.“In view of the settled position of law laid down in Aleque Padamsee's case (supra) and Sakiri Vasu's case (supra).there is no reason
“In View of the Settled Position of Law Laid Down in Vs. State of Pu ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law, the Coordinate Bench held as follows:- “In view of the settled position of law laid down in Aleque Padamsee's case (supra) and Sakiri Vasu's case (supra).there is no reason
“In View of the Settled Position of Law Laid Down in Vs. State of Pu ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
Sakiri Vasu v. State of Uttar Pradesh and otheRs.(2008) 2 SCC409 held as under:- “In view of the settled position of law laid down in Aleque Padamsee's case (supra) and Sakiri Vasu's case (supra).there is no reason
“In View of the Settled Position of Law Laid Down in Aleque Vs. Stat ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-11-2014
to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM No.-M-5116 of 2014 -2- following terMs.“In view of the settled position of law laid down in Aleque Padamsee's case (supra) and Sakiri Vasu's case (supra).there is no reason
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free