Sett - Judgment Search Results
Uma Rani Sett and ors. Vs. Dipali Rani Sett and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-09-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)CHN373
5/6th share (having 1/6th undivided share each) of the total shares and securities left by one Swarup Bikash Sett, the predecessor-in-interest of the defendants and for further declaration that the defendants had no right to have those
Manmatha Nath Sett Vs. Gobindalall Sett and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-05-1938
Reported in: AIR1939Cal135
a declaration of the rights of the parties to this suit in the estate of one Debendra Mohan Sett, for discovery of that estate, for possession, partition, accounts and other reliefs. (His Lordship after giving the relevant
Phanindra Chandra Sett Vs. Nagendra Chandra Sett and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-04-1922
Reported in: 84Ind.Cas.65
Matched in: Parties Phanindra Chandra Sett Vs. Nagendra Chandra Sett and ors.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Uma Chand Sett and anr. Vs. Kanai Lal Sett and anr. and
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-18-1921
Reported in: AIR1921Cal81(1),66Ind.Cas.621
1. This is an application by Uma Charan Sett and Annoda Prosad Sett for a Certificate that this is a fit and proper case for appeal to
Kanai Lal Sett and anr. Vs. Ram Lal Sett and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-10-1886
Reported in: (1885)ILR12Cal663
by the Legislature in a particular instance in favour of its general applicability. Moreover, it seems to be settled by the decision of this Court in Alangamonjori Dabee v. Sonamoni Dabee I.L.R. 8 Cal. 637 that, by
Manas Sett and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Mar-17-1998
Matched in: Parties Manas Sett and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
In Re: Romon Kissen Sett and ors. Vs. Hurrololl Sett and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-04-1892
Reported in: (1892)ILR19Cal334
Matched in: Parties In Re: Romon Kissen Sett and ors. Vs. Hurrololl Sett and ors.
Mritunjoy Sett (D) by Lrs. Vs. Jadunath Basak (D) by Lrs.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-26-2011
To buttress this contention further, Respondent placed heavy reliance on the rent receipts issued by Smt. Kamala Bala Sett, the erstwhile owner of the property in question, who was accepting rent earlier for and on behalf of
Samya Sett Vs. Shambu Sarkar and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-12-2005
Reported in: AIR2005SC3309; 2005(2)ALD(Cri)522; 2005CriLJ3739; [2005(4)JCR155(SC)]; JT2005(7)SC375; (2005)6SCC767
damaged out criminal justice system.. ... ... ... In my opinion the conduct of learned Judge Sri S. Sett is an example of ignoring direction of this Court for which the entire matter should be placed before
Sanjoy Kumar Sett Vs. Dharamraj Prasad and Anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-13-2016
COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE G.A.739 of 2016 With C.S.346 of 2014 Sanjoy Kumar Sett -versus Dharamraj Prasad & Anr. CORAM: HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE HARISH TANDON For the Petitioner Ms.Sutapa Sanyal, Adv.For the Respondents
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free