Setness - Judgment Search Results
Sekhar Chandra Set Vs. Vice-chancellor of the Calcutta University and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-29-1999
Reported in: (2000)10SCC216
The Text below is only a summarized version of the order pronouncedThe appellant challenged the permission given to the respondent enabling him to appear in section c and D Examination conducted by Calcutta University. The Supreme...
Set India Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Feb-01-2005
Rajendra Prasad, J.1. This criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for quashing the entire proceeding including the order dated 6.9.2002 passed in complaint case No. 855 (C)...
Set Satellite (Singapore) Pte Ltd., a Company Incorporated and Registe ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-22-2008
Reported in: (2008)110BOMLR2726; 2008BusLR850(Bom); (2008)218CTR(Bom)452; [2008]307ITR205(Bom)
F.I. Rebello, J.1. This is an Appeal by the assessee against the order of ITAT dated 20th April, 2007 in respect of assessment year 1999-2000. According to the Appellant it is a resident of Singapore and...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Set Discovery P. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2008
Reported in: AIR2008Delhi159; 151(2008)DLT531; 2008(104)DRJ590
Siddharth Mridul, J.1. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the validity of Section 36 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act 1997 (the TRAI Act, 1997) and in particular regulations 4.1 and 4.2...
“we Thus Set-aside the Direction of the Vs. State of Haryana and Oth ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.78 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision:17. 01.2013 Varinder Kumar and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE A.K.SIKRI, CHIEF...
“....Action Plans Set by This Court on Its Administrative Side Vs. A ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
CR No.1556 of 2014 (O&M) :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1556 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 3.3.2014 Bharat Rajput ....Petitioner Versus Amrik Singh Aulakh & Others ....Respondents CORAM:-...
Set Discovery Private Limited Vs. Banjara Tele Links Private Limited
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-2003
Reported in: 2003(5)ALD644
Devinder Gupta, C.J.1. This is an appeal against the order passed on 24.6.2003 by the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad on an application (I.A. No. 1735 of 2003) filed in O.P. No. 1303 of 2003...
Dominent Off-set (P) Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-c ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-30-1997
Reported in: (1998)ILLJ64P& H; (1997)116PLR736
S.C. Malte, J.1. All these three writ petitions are being disposed of by the common judgment because of the factual and legal questions involved in these petitions are the same. All these petitions are against the...
Mamta Type Setting Works Vs. Asstt. Cit
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-19-2002
Reported in: [2004]134TAXMAN34(Guj)
ORDERM.S. Shah, J.Both these appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 25-1-2002 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad in ITA Nos. 4146 and 4147/A/96.2. The appellant had purchased certain machineries and installed...
Set Jethanand Tahilram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-03-1979
Reported in: 1979(4)ELT538(Cal)
Deb, J.1. This Rule Nisi under Article 226 of the Constitution is directed inter alia, against the re-seizure of the same goods which were seized earlier under section 110(1) of Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free