Set - Judgment Search Results

Sekhar Chandra Set Vs. Vice-chancellor of the Calcutta University and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2000)10SCC216

The Text below is only a summarized version of the order pronouncedThe appellant challenged the permission given to the respondent...

Set Satellite (Singapore) Pte Ltd., a Company Incorporated and Registe ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2008)110BOMLR2726; 2008BusLR850(Bom); (2008)218CTR(Bom)452; [2008]307ITR205(Bom)

the Appellant through its dependent agent in the form of SET India (P) Limited, is carrying on marketing activities in India

Set Discovery P. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR2008Delhi159; 151(2008)DLT531; 2008(104)DRJ590

Advocate submitted that the impugned order is liable to be set aside, because it is tantamount to directing that the petitioner

“we Thus Set-aside the Direction of the Vs. State of Haryana and Oth ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. A complete set of paper book has been supplied to him. With the

“....Action Plans Set by This Court on Its Administrative Side Vs. A ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

others decided on 7.2.2014, I observed as follows:- “....Action Plans set by this Court on its administrative side are aimed at

Set India Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court: Patna

are accused Nos. 6 and 7 in the complaint petition.3. SET India Private Limited through N.P. Singh, Chief Financial Officer, 23,

Set Discovery Private Limited Vs. Banjara Tele Links Private Limited

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2003(5)ALD644

appellant herein directing it to restore signal services consisting of SET, SETMAX, AXN, CNBC, DISCOVERY and ANIMAL PLANET etc, to the

Dominent Off-set (P) Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-c ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1998)ILLJ64P& H; (1997)116PLR736

a particular action against the workman. It is in the set of this legal position, now it is to be seen

Mamta Type Setting Works Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2004]134TAXMAN34(Guj)

of the revenue and allowing the appeals of the revenue, set aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) and restored the

Set Jethanand Tahilram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1979(4)ELT538(Cal)

Deb, J.1. This Rule Nisi under Article 226 of the Constitution is directed inter alia, against the re-seizure of the...