Separate - Judgment Search Results

Rochem Separation Systems (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mazagon Dock Ltd. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2007(2)ALLMR426; 2007(1)CTLJ153(SC); 2006(13)SCALE590

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and final order dated 21.04.2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No. 884 of 2005.3. The appellant is...

Leela Separators Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Secretary (Labour), Delhi Administratio ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1981(43)FLR170]; ILR1981Delhi24; 1981LabIC1173

only one Government, the Central Government. It is different in a State, properly so called, which has a separate State Government. But, in a Union territory there is none. As its very name indicates, it is the

Leela Separator Manufacturing Co. Private Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Inc ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: [1963]49ITR332(P& H)

Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act at the instance of the assessee, Messrs. Leela Separator .The case arises out of the assessment of income-tax of the company for the assessment year 1957-58 in

Rochem Separation Systems Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

1. We have heard both sides on the application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 43,50,096/- and penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs. The demand has been confirmed on Rochem Disc and Tube Reverse Osmosis...

Rochem Separation Systems (i) Pvt Ltd., Vs. the Commissioner of Centra ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

denied on the same ground that the Tribunal allowed the benefit of notification in the case of Rochem Separation Systems (I) Pvt Ltd., Vs. CCE, Thane-II, reported in 2009 (240) ELT 474 (Tri-Mumbai). In view of the

Rochem Separation Systems (i) Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(158)ELT72Tri(Mum.)bai

It availed of the modvat credit procedure (latter Cenvat Credit Procedure). It is stated that it was maintaining separate accounts for four types of inputs for the goods manufactured by it which are common. Notice issued to

Rochem Separation Systems (i) Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(158)ELT852Tri(Mum.)bai

It availed of the Modvat credit procedure (latter Cenvat Credit Procedure). It is stated that it was maintaining separate accounts for four types of inputs for the goods manufactured by it which are common. Notice issued to

Westfalia Separator India Pvt. Vs. Alfa Laval Agri (India) Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

cooling tank for installation at Village Kal-Jharani in the State of Punjab, the applicant/informant No. 1 namely Westfalia Separator India Private Limited, approached the Punjab Government for procuring the purchase order. The respondent namely Alfa Laval Agri

Mineral Separation Corp. Vs. Magma Copper Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

oils and other substances having a preferential affinity for the metalliferous particles in ores, can be used to separate them, in a froth, from the gangue by mixing such substances with the pulverized ore in water and

Minerals Separation, Ltd. Vs. Hyde

Court: US Supreme Court

in the suit relates "to improvements in the process for the concentration of ores, the object being to separate metalliferous matter from gangue by means of oils, fatty acids, or other substances which have a preferential affinity