- Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
- Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
- Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.
Separate - Judgment Search Results
Rochem Separation Systems (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mazagon Dock Ltd. and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-08-2006
Reported in: 2007(2)ALLMR426; 2007(1)CTLJ153(SC); 2006(13)SCALE590
AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and final order dated 21.04.2005 passed by the...
Leela Separators Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Secretary (Labour), Delhi Administratio ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-1981
Reported in: [1981(43)FLR170]; ILR1981Delhi24; 1981LabIC1173
different in a State, properly so called, which has a separate State Government. But, in a Union territory there is none.
Leela Separator Manufacturing Co. Private Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Inc ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-14-1962
Reported in: [1963]49ITR332(P& H)
Income-tax Act at the instance of the assessee, Messrs. Leela Separator .The case arises out of the assessment of income-tax of
Rochem Separation Systems Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-03-2006
1. We have heard both sides on the application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 43,50,096/- and penalty...
Rochem Separation Systems (i) Pvt Ltd., Vs. the Commissioner of Centra ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-30-2010
allowed the benefit of notification in the case of Rochem Separation Systems (I) Pvt Ltd., Vs. CCE, Thane-II, reported in 2009
Rochem Separation Systems (i) Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-04-2003
Reported in: (2003)(158)ELT72Tri(Mum.)bai
Cenvat Credit Procedure). It is stated that it was maintaining separate accounts for four types of inputs for the goods manufactured
Rochem Separation Systems (i) Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-02-2003
Reported in: (2003)(158)ELT852Tri(Mum.)bai
Cenvat Credit Procedure). It is stated that it was maintaining separate accounts for four types of inputs for the goods manufactured
Westfalia Separator India Pvt. Vs. Alfa Laval Agri (India) Ltd.
Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC
Decided on: Jul-13-2001
the State of Punjab, the applicant/informant No. 1 namely Westfalia Separator India Private Limited, approached the Punjab Government for procuring the
Mineral Separation Corp. Vs. Magma Copper Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-24-1930
for the metalliferous particles in ores, can be used to separate them, in a froth, from the gangue by mixing such
Minerals Separation, Ltd. Vs. Hyde
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-11-1916
process for the concentration of ores, the object being to separate metalliferous matter from gangue by means of oils, fatty acids,
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »