Senseful - Judgment Search Results
Thread Sense vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-04-2024
THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 8760 OF 2024 PETITIONER: THREAD SENSE THREAD SENSE HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SIJU M JOSE, MAROTTIMOOTTIL, KUDAYATHOOR P.O KUDAYATHOOR,
Colour Sense Vs. Commercial Tax Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2007
Reported in: (2009)23VST434(Mad)
ORDERS. Manikumar, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the order of assessment for 2005-2006. The firm reported a total turnover of Rs. 21,34,430.80 taxable at three per cent and the assessee produced several records in support of...
National Remote Sensing Agency Represented by Its Director Vs. the Add ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-21-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)ALD211; 2002(4)ALT788; [2002(95)FLR786]; (2002)IIILLJ741AP
1. In this batch of writ petitions, the question that arises for consideration is: 'Whether the National Remote Sensing Agency is an 'Industry' as defined in Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947?'Factual Matrix: 2. In
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ashok Udaram Pathrabe Vs. Maharashtra Remote Sensing Application Centr ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-29-2006
Reported in: 2007(1)ALLMR717; 2007(1)MhLj519
filing of this petition are as under:3. The petitioner was working as Accounts Officer with the Maharashtra Remote Sensing Application Centre, Nagpur (the ' MRSAC' for short); which is a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act.
Yadamma T. Vs. National Remote Sensing Agency and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-17-1997
Reported in: 1997(4)ALD415; 1997(4)ALT578; 1997(2)APLJ107
once that option is exercised, compliance with Sub-rules (1) to (5) of Rule 5 becomes mandatory in the sense that any non-compliance with prescribed procedure will positively indicate the wilful nature of default committed in paying or
Cap. T. Ravinder Singh Vs. National Remote Sensing Agency Rep. by Dire ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-1997
Reported in: 1997(2)ALT269
M.H.S. Ansari, J.1. The petitioner in the above writ petition has questioned the legality and validity of the appointment of the Respondents 2 and 3 as 'Trainee Pilots' in Respondent No. 1 Organisation.2. The petitioner is...
E. Chitra Ramacharandas Vs. National Remote Sensing Agency, Hyd. and A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-27-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALD161; 2000(5)ALT258
the effect thereof and it should not be read in hypercritical manner but should be construed in common sense way. I have also taken a similar view in the case of P. Dharma Reddy v. B. Vijayalaxmi,
Devaprasad vs Kerala State Remote Sensing Agencyand Environment Centre ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-03-2021
- 682 019. BY ADVS. P.M.ZIRAJ C.M.DHANY IRFAN ZIRAJ MOHEMED FAVAS HASHARURAHIMAN U. RESPONDENTS: 1 KERALA STATE REMOTE SENSING AGENCY AND ENVIRONMENT CENTRE (KSRSEC) VIKAS BHAVAN, C BLOCK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA - 695033, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR. 2
Asha.L vs Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment Centre
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-12-2020
/ 21ST SRAVANA, 1942 WP(C).No.14219 OF 2019(B) PETITIONER/S: 1 ASHA.L AGED 47 YEARS CONFIDENTIAL ASSISTANT, KERALA STATE REMOTE SENSING AND ENVIRONMENT CENTRE, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-33, RESIDING AT TC 9/330(3), PLRA/F-37/2, SREEKRISHNA PRABHA, SATHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695010 2 RAMESH KUMAR
Water World Tourism Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Kerala State Remote Sensing a ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
CHUNGAM, ALAPPUZHA-688011. BY ADVS. SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN SMT.BHANU THILAK SRI.A.VISHNU PRAKASH SRI.RAAJESH S.SUBRAHMANIAN SRI.SETHURAM DHARMAPALAN SRI.V.R.RAJESH RESPONDENT:1 KERALA STATE REMOTE SENSING AND ENVIRONMENT CENTER REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, 1ST FLOOR, VIKAS BHAVAN, PMG, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033. * ADDL.R2 LOCAL LEVEL
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free