Sen - Judgment Search Results

Durga Charan Sen Vs. Sen and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1885)ILR11Cal680

time when the exclusion becomes known to the plaintiff. Now, who is meant by the plaintiff in this sentence? The plaintiff there, I conceive, must mean the member of the joint family who has been excluded from

Sen Vs. Co-operative Medical College

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR2005Ker245; 2005(2)ESC1362; 2005(1)KLT612

B. Subhashan Reddy, C.J. 1. This batch of cases relates to admissions into M.B.B.S. course for the academic year 2004-05 and involves interpretation of the proviso to Sub-section (4) of Section 3 of the Kerala Self-financing...

Smt. Protima Sen Vs. Beney Bhushan Sen

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1972)4SCC205

Matched in: Parties Smt. Protima Sen Vs. Beney Bhushan Sen

Anupama Sen Gupta and ors. Vs. Deb Kumar Sen Sarma and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1982SC25a; 1981(3)SCALE1472; (1981)4SCC544; 1981(13)LC779(SC)

1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act.').2. The first respondent in each of these appeals is Deb Kumar Sen Sarma. He was working as a Sub-Inspector of Police, Calcutta in the year, 1977 and was residing in

Kedar Nath Sen Vs. Smt. Sulekha Sen and Ors.

Court: Kolkata

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BEFORE : The Hon’ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN C.S.No.2 of 1996 Kedar Nath Sen versus Smt. Sulekha Sen & ORS.For the plaintiff : Mr.Tapan Coomar Dey,

Vinay Kumar Sen Vs. Smt. Usha Sen

Court: Madhya Pradesh

1 Cr.R.No.201/2013. 8.2.2013 . Shri Quazi Parvez, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Punit Shroti, learned P.L.for the respondent/ State. The applicant has preferred this revision being aggrieved by the order dated 16.1.2013 passed by 1st...

Ramayan Prasad Sen Vs. Ramniranjan Sen

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Matched in: Parties Ramayan Prasad Sen Vs. Ramniranjan Sen

Shyamal Kumar Sen Vs. Mrs. Debjani Sen and anr.

Court: Kolkata

of 2005 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION In the goods of: Paramesh Chandra Sen (Deceased) And In the matter of: Shyamal Kumar Sen Versus MRS.Debjani Sen & Anr. Before: The Hon'ble Justice

Ranu Sen Vs. Kandarpa Sen

Court: Delhi

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: November 18, 2013 + CM(M) No.1091/2012 RANU SEN Through ..... Petitioner Ms.Indrani Ghosh, Adv. versus KANDARPA SEN Through ..... Respondent Ms.Meena Kumari, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.

Sm. Gita Sen and anr. Vs. Sm. Sova Sen and ors.

Court: Kolkata

ORDER CS No.535 of 2001 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction SM. GITA SEN & ANR. Versus SM. SOVA SEN & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date : 3rd March 2014.