Self Regulated - Judgment Search Results

Central Electricity Regul. Commission Vs. Damodar Valley Corp.

Court: Supreme Court of India

The challenge in the appeals before the learned Appellate Tribunal was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as “CERC”) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar

“relying Upon Regulation 19 of the Rajiv Gandhi National Vs. Rajiv G ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

issued following contention of counsel for the petitioners was noticed by this Court on 16.11.2012 :- “Relying upon Regulation 19 of the Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law Regulations, it is contended that petitioners are entitled to

The Sakhigopal Regulated Market Committee Vs. Brudaban Chandra Hota an ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1991Ori252

Matched in: Parties The Sakhigopal Regulated Market Committee Vs. Brudaban Chandra Hota and anr.

Bethuadahari Regulated Market Committee Vs. Tapan Kumar Saha and Other ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1991Cal371,95CWN550

area within which purchase and sale of agricultural produce as may be specified in the notification, shall be regulated.6. Under Section 5 of the Act a Market Committee for every market area has to be constituted in

The Regulation Collector of Uthumalai Estate Vs. R. Subbier

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1908)18MLJ581

1. This appeal relates to a claim duly preferred to the Regulation Collector of the Uthumalai estate for a sum due to the claimant by the estate. The claim was

Talcher Municipality Vs. Talcher Regulated Mkt. Committee and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2004SC3954; 99(2005)CLT174(SC); JT2004(6)SC65; 2004(6)SCALE339; (2004)6SCC178; (2004)3UPLBEC2852

the market wherein the buying and selling of the agricultural produces are carried on is sought to be regulated and controlled. A 'market area' and the 'market' as defined in Section 2(vii) and 2(vi) respectively are required

Brihanmumbai Electric Sup.and Tran.Underta Vs. Maharashtra Elect.Regul ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

of 1910, 1948 and 1998 which were operating in the field needed to be brought in a new self contained comprehensive legislation with the policy of encouraging private sector participation in generation, transmission and distribution and also … OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4223 OF2012Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking ….Appellant Vs. Mahrashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC) & Ors. ….Respondents JUDGMENT A.K.SIKRI,J.1. Respondent No.3 is a consumer (hereinafter referred to as the “consumer”)

J.Irudaya Nirmala Vs The Director(Regulations),

Court: Chennai

that a BDS (Bachelor of Dental Surgery) is a degree equivalent to MBBS degree in Medicine and is regulated under Sections 2(h) and 35 of the National Commission for Indian System of Medicine Act, 2020, (hereinafter referred

Jasjit Singh and anr. Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Board and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(3)ALLMR214; 2007(3)BomCR854

Mhase S.B., J.1. These three appeals have been directed as against the order passed by the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board on April 29, 1980 in Appeal Nos. 329, 371 and 372 of 1979. These three appeals

Arunkumar Spinning Mill Ltd., Represented by Its Managing Director, Mr ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2007)2MLJ413

Matched in: Parties Arunkumar Spinning Mill Ltd., Represented by Its Managing Director, Mr. A. Velusamy Vs. the Superintendent, Regulated Market, Coimbatore Market Committee