Self Proving - Judgment Search Results

Flra Vs. Aberdeen Proving Grounds

Court: US Supreme Court

485 u s 411 in september 1981 the respondent aberdeen proving ground notified its employees union representatives that aberdeen intended to

“parties Are Yet to Lead Evidence to Prove their Respective Pleas. V ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

reads as follows parties are yet to lead evidence to prove their respective pleas relevancy of any document cannot be challenged

“The Witness Examined by the Petitioner Proved Report Vs. Charanjit ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

whereof read as under the witness examined by the petitioner proved report ex dw 4 1 in favour of the defendants

Purviance Vs. Angus

Court: US Supreme Court

board and of doctor wilson waters surgeon of the hibernia prove that they did not see the argo and betsey nor

In Re : N.V. Natarajan and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1965CriLJ49

veeraswami j 1 the question raised in this petition is as to the constitutional validity of the prevention of insults...

Gurmukh Rai Vs. Secretary of State for India in Council.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1934]2ITR412(All)

this is an application for leave to appeal to his majesty in council from an order of the high court...

J P Sharma vs.the State ( Cbi)

Court: Delhi

..... account of the appellant which was withdrawn by 8 self cheques proved to be in the handwriting of appellant by the opinion of ..... sum of 5 15 000 through 10 self cheques hand writing on the self cheques has been proved to be of appellant vide the ..... less than one year and corresponding withdrawals by self cheques during the same period proves unaccounted for deposits and withdrawals from his bank .....

Present: M/S Sukhdeep Singh Sandhu and Y.K.Saxena Advocates for the Vs ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... no 725 db of 2008 preparation for the facts proved or not proved in such trial such criminal trial was also not ..... utter strangers but like other offences criminal conspiracy can be proved by circumstantial evidence indeed in most cases proof of ..... doubt supplemental safeguards as they will promote the guarantee against self incrimination even at the stage of interrogation but these requirements .....

State Through Reference Vs. Ram Singh and ors.

Court: Delhi

..... viz dock identification and identification by tip the investigating agency adopted scientific methods for conclusively proving the identity of the accused persons such as dna analysis fingerprint and bite mark analysis ..... minds must have at that point of time brought forth their instinct of survival and self preservation the desire to have apprehended their assailants and to mete out just desserts to .....

Baljeet Singh and anr. Vs. State

Court: Delhi

evidence to prove the guilt of these accused persons besides proving the ocular evidence of child witness poorvi pw 10 he