Self Possession - Judgment Search Results
“1. Whether the Plaintiff Is the Owner in Possession of the Property ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
Mahboob. It is alleged that the plaintiff is not in possession of the suit property and is residing in another property.
“that Neither the Plaintiff Is Owner in Possession of the Suit Land ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-27-2012
permanent injunction for restraining the defendants from taking over the possession of the land measuring 7 Kanal 5 Marla. A copy
Right to Seek Possession Especially Since NaraIn Dass Vs. Krishan Lal ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-13-2012
Revision No.650 of 2012 (O&M) - 2- right to seek possession especially since Narain Dass had also been examined as a
Turn these results into brief-ready notes
as Per the Pleaded Case of the Petitioner Herself She Possesses Vs. St ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
As per the pleaded case of the petitioner herself, she possesses the B.A Degree with Sanskrit as an elective subject as
“that the Petitioner Society Own and Possess Property Vs. M/S Basant ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-15-2013
add the following amendment:- “That the petitioner society own and possess property not ID/14 NIT Faridabad property sub division No.6 at
“that the Petitioner Society Own and Possess Property Vs. M/S Surend ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-15-2013
add the following amendment:- “That the petitioner society own and possess property not ID/14 NIT Faridabad property sub division No.6 at
“that the Petitioner Society Own and Possess Property Vs. M/S Bakshi ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-15-2013
add the following amendment:- “That the petitioner society own and possess property not ID/14 NIT Faridabad property sub division No.6 at
“that the Petitioner Society Own and Possess Property Vs. M/S Kiddie ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-15-2013
add the following amendment:- “That the petitioner society own and possess property not ID/14 NIT Faridabad property sub division No.6 at
Whether the Plaintiff Is Exclusive Owner in Possession of the Vs. Gene ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-11-2014
whereby suit for declaration that she is exclusive owner in possession of the property in question was dismissed. The plaintiff claimed
“1. the Allegation Is That the Petitioner Was Found in Possession of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-07-2014
on 30.8.2013, three injections of Norgesic were recovered from the possession of the petitioner, whereas five injections of Norgesic each, were
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free