Self Posited - Judgment Search Results
Positive Commercial Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-04-1990
Reported in: (1991)2CALLT96(HC)
Paritosh Kumar Mukherjee, J.1. This writ petition was moved on behalf of petitioners M/s. Positive Commercial Co. Ltd. & Anr., challenging, inter alia, the seizure made by the Respondents and imposition of penalty
Positive Television Private Limited Vs. Ms. Manoranjana Singh and Anot ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Mar-09-2012
left her job and career after the marriage. She set up two companies, Overarch Communications Private Limited and Positiv Press Private Limited. The respondent owned 60% of the equity stake and Mr. Matang Sinh did not own
Bendix Corporation Vs. Radio Position Finding Corp.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-21-1963
BENDIX CORPORATION v. RADIO POSITION FINDING CORP. - 371 U.S. 577 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court BENDIX CORPORATION v. RADIO POSITION FINDING CORP., 371
18-section briefs on any result in this list
the Delhi Network of Positive People Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-07-2015
DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h May, 2015 % + W.P.(C) No.2867/2014 THE DELHI NETWORK OF POSITIVE PEOPLE ... Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand Grover, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Saurabh Chauhan, Mr. Varun Jain & Ms.
“In View of the Settled Position of Law Laid Down in Vs. State of Pu ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
petitions decided on 02.12.2013, while declining to interfere, the Bench observed as under: “In view of the settled position of law laid down in Aleque Padamsee's case (supra) and Sakiri Vasu's case (supra).there is no reason for
“In View of the Settled Position of Law Laid Down in Aleque Vs. Stat ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-31-2014
extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C., it had been held in the following terMs.“In view of the settled position of law laid down in Aleque Padamsee's case (supra) and Sakiri Vasu's case (supra).there is no reason for
“In View of the Settled Position of Law Laid Down in Vs. State of Pu ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law, the Coordinate Bench held as follows:- “In view of the settled position of law laid down in Aleque Padamsee's case (supra) and Sakiri Vasu's case (supra).there is no reason for
“In View of the Settled Position of Law Laid Down in Vs. State of Pu ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
Vasu v. State of Uttar Pradesh and otheRs.(2008) 2 SCC409 held as under:- “In view of the settled position of law laid down in Aleque Padamsee's case (supra) and Sakiri Vasu's case (supra).there is no reason for
“In View of the Settled Position of Law Laid Down in Aleque Vs. Stat ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-11-2014
the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM No.-M-5116 of 2014 -2- following terMs.“In view of the settled position of law laid down in Aleque Padamsee's case (supra) and Sakiri Vasu's case (supra).there is no reason for
“In View of the Settled Position of Law Laid Down in Vs. State of Pu ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-13-2014
chandigarh CRM No.M-5514 of 2014 (O&M) -2- Coordinate Bench has held as follows:- “In view of the settled position of law laid down in Aleque Padamsee's case (supra) and Sakiri Vasu's case (supra).there is no reason for
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free