Self Explaining - Judgment Search Results
Be Dismissed as the Petitioner Has Not Explained Full Vs. Punjab State ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
present writ petition is liable to CWP No.18473 of 2011 -2- be dismissed as the petitioner has not explained full facts of the present case. It is a fact that as per fitment table 12, the basic
“3. the Appellant Was Required to ExplaIn Each Day of Delay. in the ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
appeal was filed on 23.2.2013. In the application for condonation of delay, no plausible ground has been mentioned explaining the delay. The appellant merely stated that he was oblivious of the order. He was informed by some
“3. the Prosecution Has to ExplaIn Such an Inconsistency in the Firs ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
way of order dated 25.2.2014 and repelled the same argument in the following manner:-“3. The prosecution has to explain such an inconsistency in the first information report as well the in the FSL report during the course
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free