Seining - Judgment Search Results
Baidyanath SeIn Vs. Rajendranath SeIn and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-19-1930
Reported in: AIR1930Cal803
Rankin, C.J.1. In my opinion this appeal must be allowed. It appears that the testator died on 14th December 1928. He left a will dated 11tb, October 1928 appointing his son the present appellant to be...
Baidyanath SeIn Vs. Rajendra Nath SeIn and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-19-1930
Reported in: 129Ind.Cas.879
George Claus Rankin, C.J.1. In my opinion, this appeal must be allowed. It appears that the testator died on the 14th December, 1928. He left a Will dated the 11th October, 1928, appointing his eon the...
Maung SeIn Shwe Vs. Maung SeIn Gyi and Others
Court: Privy Council
Decided on: Nov-20-1934
Sir Lancelot Sanderson: This is an appeal by Maung Sein Shwe by special leave from a decree of the High Court of Judicature at Rangoon, dated 13th June
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Purse Seine Fishermens Primary vs Income Tax Officer
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-18-2025
NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 21768 OF 2024 (T-IT) BETWEEN: PURSE SEINE FISHERMENS PRIMARY SERVICE CO-OPEARATIVE SOCIETY LTD., FISHERIES ROAD, KOTA POST, BRAHMAVARA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 221 REPRESENTED
Bir SeIn Anand and ors. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Jun-24-1983
Reported in: [1983]54STC354(NULL)
I.K. Kotwal, J.1. The petitioners in all these petitions are dealers duly registered under the Jammu and Kashmir General Sales Tax Act, 1962, hereinafter to be referred to as the Act, who have been called upon...
Mangal SeIn Vs. Sri Kishan Dass and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-24-1972
Reported in: AIR1973P& H456
1. The petitioner Shri Mangal Sein has called in question the election of Shri Sri Kishan Dass to the Haryana Legislative Assembly from Rohtak
Maung SeIn Done Vs. Ma Pan Nyun
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-12-1932
Reported in: (1932)34BOMLR1040
22, 1918.6. She was survived by her two sons, the respondent Maung Sit Paung, and the appellant, Maung Sein Done, and her two daughters, the respondents, Ma Pan Nyun and Ma Sein, On her death her two
Prem Lall SeIn Vs. Radha Bullav Kankra
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-28-1930
Reported in: AIR1931Cal140
Williams, J.1. The point which I have to decide in this case is, whether a promissory note payable on demand, in which there is no mention of interest, cornea within the provisions of S. 80, Negotiable...
Baidya Nath SeIn Vs. Kumud Chandra Paul and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-19-1935
Reported in: 164Ind.Cas.815
Panckridge, J.1. This is an appeal from the decision of Mr. Justice Ameer Ali who passed a decree in the respondent's favour for Rs. 2,400, with interest and costs.2. The suit was for the sum decreed,...
Maung SeIn Done Vs. Ma Pan Nyun and Others
Court: Privy Council
Decided on: Apr-12-1932
January 1918. She was survived by her two sons, the respondent Maung Sit Paung, and the appellant Maung Sein Done, and her two daughters, the respondents, Ma Pan Nyun and Ma Sein. On her death her two
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free