Seine - Judgment Search Results
Baidyanath SeIn Vs. Rajendranath SeIn and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-19-1930
Reported in: AIR1930Cal803
Rankin, C.J.1. In my opinion this appeal must be allowed. It appears that the testator died on 14th December 1928....
Baidyanath SeIn Vs. Rajendra Nath SeIn and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-19-1930
Reported in: 129Ind.Cas.879
George Claus Rankin, C.J.1. In my opinion, this appeal must be allowed. It appears that the testator died on the...
Maung SeIn Shwe Vs. Maung SeIn Gyi and Others
Court: Privy Council
Decided on: Nov-20-1934
Sir Lancelot Sanderson: This is an appeal by Maung Sein Shwe by special leave from a decree of the High
Turn these results into brief-ready notes
Bir SeIn Anand and ors. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Jun-24-1983
Reported in: [1983]54STC354(NULL)
I.K. Kotwal, J.1. The petitioners in all these petitions are dealers duly registered under the Jammu and Kashmir General Sales...
Mangal SeIn Vs. Sri Kishan Dass and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-24-1972
Reported in: AIR1973P& H456
1. The petitioner Shri Mangal Sein has called in question the election of Shri Sri Kishan
Maung SeIn Done Vs. Ma Pan Nyun
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-12-1932
Reported in: (1932)34BOMLR1040
sons, the respondent Maung Sit Paung, and the appellant, Maung Sein Done, and her two daughters, the respondents, Ma Pan Nyun
Prem Lall SeIn Vs. Radha Bullav Kankra
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-28-1930
Reported in: AIR1931Cal140
Williams, J.1. The point which I have to decide in this case is, whether a promissory note payable on demand,...
Baidya Nath SeIn Vs. Kumud Chandra Paul and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-19-1935
Reported in: 164Ind.Cas.815
Panckridge, J.1. This is an appeal from the decision of Mr. Justice Ameer Ali who passed a decree in the...
Maung SeIn Done Vs. Ma Pan Nyun and Others
Court: Privy Council
Decided on: Apr-12-1932
sons, the respondent Maung Sit Paung, and the appellant Maung Sein Done, and her two daughters, the respondents, Ma Pan Nyun
Rutnessur SeIn and ors. Vs. Jusoda and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-06-1887
W. Comer Petheram, C.J.1. I think that this appeal must be allowed.2. This is an action to recover certain mortgage...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free