Seine - Judgment Search Results

Baidyanath SeIn Vs. Rajendranath SeIn and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1930Cal803

Rankin, C.J.1. In my opinion this appeal must be allowed. It appears that the testator died on 14th December 1928. He left a will dated 11tb, October 1928 appointing his son the present appellant to be...

Baidyanath SeIn Vs. Rajendra Nath SeIn and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 129Ind.Cas.879

George Claus Rankin, C.J.1. In my opinion, this appeal must be allowed. It appears that the testator died on the 14th December, 1928. He left a Will dated the 11th October, 1928, appointing his eon the...

Maung SeIn Shwe Vs. Maung SeIn Gyi and Others

Court: Privy Council

Sir Lancelot Sanderson: This is an appeal by Maung Sein Shwe by special leave from a decree of the High Court of Judicature at Rangoon, dated 13th June

Bir SeIn Anand and ors. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: [1983]54STC354(NULL)

I.K. Kotwal, J.1. The petitioners in all these petitions are dealers duly registered under the Jammu and Kashmir General Sales Tax Act, 1962, hereinafter to be referred to as the Act, who have been called upon...

Mangal SeIn Vs. Sri Kishan Dass and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1973P& H456

1. The petitioner Shri Mangal Sein has called in question the election of Shri Sri Kishan Dass to the Haryana Legislative Assembly from Rohtak

Maung SeIn Done Vs. Ma Pan Nyun

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1932)34BOMLR1040

22, 1918.6. She was survived by her two sons, the respondent Maung Sit Paung, and the appellant, Maung Sein Done, and her two daughters, the respondents, Ma Pan Nyun and Ma Sein, On her death her two

Prem Lall SeIn Vs. Radha Bullav Kankra

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1931Cal140

Williams, J.1. The point which I have to decide in this case is, whether a promissory note payable on demand, in which there is no mention of interest, cornea within the provisions of S. 80, Negotiable...

Baidya Nath SeIn Vs. Kumud Chandra Paul and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 164Ind.Cas.815

Panckridge, J.1. This is an appeal from the decision of Mr. Justice Ameer Ali who passed a decree in the respondent's favour for Rs. 2,400, with interest and costs.2. The suit was for the sum decreed,...

Maung SeIn Done Vs. Ma Pan Nyun and Others

Court: Privy Council

January 1918. She was survived by her two sons, the respondent Maung Sit Paung, and the appellant Maung Sein Done, and her two daughters, the respondents, Ma Pan Nyun and Ma Sein. On her death her two

Rutnessur SeIn and ors. Vs. Jusoda and anr.

Court: Kolkata

W. Comer Petheram, C.J.1. I think that this appeal must be allowed.2. This is an action to recover certain mortgage money, and the only question in the case is whether the plaintiffs, in addition to recovering...