Seemingly - Judgment Search Results

Shashi Shekhar Seem vs.state & Anr.

Court: Delhi

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 16, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2426/2017 & CRL.M.A.9780/2017 SHASHI SHEKHAR SEEM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kunal Kalra, Advocate STATE & ANR versus .....Respondents Through:...

Seems Steel India and anr. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2002)(104)LC773Tri(Chennai)

1. Both the stay applications and the appeals arise out of a common impugned order in appeal. As the issue lies in a short compass and is covered by a decision of this Bench, both the...

Manish Narayan Vs. Seem BourIn and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2009ACJ2271; [2009(2)JCR287(Jhr)]

ORDER1. This appeal by the owner of the offending vehicle is directed against the judgment and award dated 22nd August, 2007 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dhanbad in Title (M.V.) suit No. 136 of...

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Mrs. Seems Ramdas Telhande and Oth ...

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

Oral Judgment: The appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act) is directed against the Judgment and Award dated 22-08-2011 passed by the Motor accidents claims Tribunal at Wardha...

Caprihans India Ltd. Vs. Tarun Seem, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(6)BomCR559; (2003)185CTR(Bom)157; [2004]266ITR566(Bom)

S.H. Kapadia, J.1. Rule. Respondents waive service.2. By consent, writ petition is taken up for final hearing.3. Heard learned counsel on both sides. In this case, arguments were heard by us on 24th July, 2003. After...

Caprihans India Ltd. Vs. Tarun Seem, Dy. Cit

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [2003]132TAXMAN123(Bom)

S.H. Kapadia, J.Rule. Respondents waive service.2. By consent, writ petition is taken up for final hearing.3. Heard learned counsel on both sides. In this case, arguments were heard by us on 24-7-2003. After hearing the arguments,...