See Thomas V United - Judgment Search Results

Gooding Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

thereof; and all provisions of law in relation to bail in the District shall apply to this chapter." See Thomas v. United States, 409 U.S. 992, 993 (1973) (DOUGLAS, J., dissenting). [ Footnote 32 ] "§ 879. Search warrants." "

Nye and Nissen Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

the concept of at least implicit agreement may mark it somewhat apart from counseling, for example, or inducing. See Thomas v. United States, 57 F.2d 1039, 1042; United States v. Mack, 112 F.2d 290, 292. Precise use of words is

United States Vs. Thomas

Court: US Supreme Court

United States v. Thomas - 362 U.S. 58 (1960) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Thomas, 362 U.S. 58 (1960) United States

United States Vs. Thomas

Court: US Supreme Court

United States v. Thomas - 195 U.S. 418 (1904) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Thomas, … nothing in the Navy Personnel Act inconsistent with or repealing Rev.Stat. section 1571, and the case of Gibson v. United States, 194 U. S. 182 , is not in point. In that case, it was held that the … shall be seven cents per mile, distances to be computed over the shortest usually traveled routes," but mileage seems not to have been claimed for his traveling from Washington to Hong Kong, by reason of the further

Thomas Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Thomas v. United States - 192 U.S. 363 (1904) U.S. Supreme Court Thomas v. United States, 192 U.S. 363 (1904) Thomas

United States Vs. Thomas

Court: US Supreme Court

United States v. Thomas - 151 U.S. 577 (1894) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Thomas, 151 U.S. 577 (1894) United States … the Enabling Act of 1846. It had been included within the limits of the reservations. As will be seen by the treaty of 1842, ratified in 1843, which was previous to the Enabling Act, the Indians stipulated

United States Vs. Thomas

Court: US Supreme Court

United States v. Thomas - 82 U.S. 337 (1872) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Thomas, … cases of overruling necessity. On the contrary, in the last reported case on the subject, that of Bevans v. United States, [ Footnote 27 ] MR. JUSTICE STRONG, delivering the opinion of this Court, says: "It may be … officer's obligation arising merely from his appointment, and aside from such a bond as exists in this case, seems almost self-evident. If it is not, then every military commander who ever lost a battle or was obliged

Sita Soren Vs. Union Of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

prosecution case. Page 99 of 135 PART H147 In United States v. Thomas F Johnson,71 a member of Congress was accused of conflict of interest … legislative functions would automatically attract immunity under the Speech and Debate Clause of the US Constitution.150. In Gavel v. United States,73 certain secret documents were made part of the record of a sub-committee hearing in the US Senate … Articles 105(2) and 194(2) and any attempt to whittle down their protective scope to adhere to what is seemingly “logical”, “fair” or “reasonable” would be constitutionally unjustified. However, while advancing his oral submissions in rejoinder, Mr Ramachandran

L. Chandra Kumar Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC1125; 1997(1)BLJR735; (1997)1CALLT55(SC); 83(1997)CLT815(SC); 1997(92)ELT318(SC); [1997]228ITR725(SC); JT1997(3)SC589; 1997(1)MPLJ621; 1997(I)OLR(SC)408; 1997(3)SC; 1997 (3) SCC 261

the District of Columbia v. Tidewater Transfer Co. 93 L. Ed. 1156 337 US 582, Thomas S. William v. United States 77 L. Ed. 1372 289 US 553, Cooper v. Aaron 3 L. Ed. 2d 5 358 US … former were to act as substitutes for the latter in adjudicating service matters; the Tribunals could not, therefore, seek parity for all other purposes. 25. In Amulya Chandra's case, a Division Bench of this Court had to

P.V. Narsimha Rao Vs. State (Cbi/Spe)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1998SC2120; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)157; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)762; 1997(1)BLJR263; 1998CriLJ2930; 1998(3)SCALE53; (1998)4SCC626; [1998]2SCR870

functioning of the legislative powers'. [See : United Stated v. Johnson, 15 L Ed 2d 681. In Burton v. United States, 202 US 344, the US Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a Senator who had been bribed