See Self V State - Judgment Search Results

Saraswat Co-op. Bank Employees Union Vs. V. State of Maharashtra and o ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1996(5)BomCR122; [1996(74)FLR1945]; (1997)ILLJ232Bom; 1996(2)MhLj10

commits any wilful act of fraud or commits any contravention of the provisions of the Act etc. We see considerable force in his contention. Section 10 of the Act reads as follows : '10. Cancellation of registration … prepared on March 8, 1994. The learned counsel for petitioner submits that this action of the respondent is vitiated by non application of mind and hence illegal. Be that as it may, we do not propose to … not filed the returns and also calling for the explanation. It also stated that if the explanation is not filed within two months the registration

Sharadchandra Vinayak Dongre, and Others Etc. Vs. V. State of Maharash ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1991CriLJ3329

the parties at length, I had passed the following operative order on 1st February 1990 :- 'Heard Mr. V. R. Manohar with Mr. Rahimatoola and Mr. S. V. Manohar for the Petitioners and Mr. Gangakhedkar, A.P.P. for … Manohar with Mr. Rahimatoola and Mr. S. V. Manohar for the Petitioners and Mr. Gangakhedkar, A.P.P. for the State-Respondent. For reasons stated in the accompanying judgment, the Rule is made absolute to the extent that the order

M. Vs. Chacko V. State of Madras.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1968]70ITR801(Mad)

thirdly, the leasehold interest shall be the sole concern of M. V. Chacko, the assessee. The last point seems to negative any theory of investment by Mr. John. Under the agreement right through the leasehold interest should

Om NaraIn Agarwal and Others Vs. Nagar Palika, Shahjahanpur and Others ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1993SC1440; JT1993(4)SC483; 1993(1)SCALE663; (1993)2SCC242; [1993]2SCR34; (1993)2UPLBEC817

the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Writ Petition No. 1067 of 1991 Prem Kumar Balmiki v. State of U.P. by order dated 13.11.1991 held that the fourth proviso to Section 9 of the Act was … we are not concerned with the removal as contained in Section 40 of the Act. The right to seek an election or to be elected or nominated to a statutory body, depends and arises under a statute.

Morvi Municipality Vs. State of Gujarat and ors. (Ca No. 1374 of 1974) ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1993)112CTR(SC)448

be imposed. -(1) Subject to any general or special orders which the State Government may make in this behalf and the provisions of ss. 101 … capital value in the case of the properties noted in sub-r. C.'It will be apparent that the rule seeks to lay down the mode of working out the annual letting value of the property. According to the … tax-payers of the appellant-Morvi Municipality (the Municipality) had filed a writ petition in the High Court challenging the validity of the rules made by it for the levy of consolidated property tax on lands and buildings and

M/S. Vs. Gunaviah Naidu and Sons Etc. V. State of Tamil Nadu and anr. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1977)6CTR(SC)14

tax under the State Act has been paid in respect of those hides and skins. The Legislature, it seems, calculated the price of hides and skins in dressed condition to be double the price of such hides … special leave are against the judgment of Madras High Court whereby that court repelled the challenge to the validity of items 7(a) and 7(b) of the Second Schedule to the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959 (hereinafter

M/S. Balabhagas Hulaschand Vs. State of OrissA. (Civil Appeals Nos. 44 ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1976)5CTR(SC)175

the same firm in respect of the sales tax levied by the State of Orissa for the quarters ending December, 1959, March, 1960 and December, … transfer of goods on the hire purchase or other system of payment by installments, etc.It would thus be seen that the word sale has been given a very wide connotation by the Parliament so as to include … previous judgment, which is the subject-matter of the six appeals mentioned above and held that the levy was valid. The points of law arising in these appeals also are identical to the points arising in the other

1. Ansi Devi V. State of Jandk; and ors. Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

JAMMU. OWP No. 654 OF 200.AND OWP No. 228 OF 200.AND OWP No. 229 OF 200.1. Ansi Devi v. State of J&K and ors.2. Kailash v. State of J&K and ors.3. Balo v. State of J&K and ors.4.

Lajja Ram and ors. V. State of Haryana Vs. Unknown

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Mr.H.S.Deol, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr.Sanjay Jain, Advocate for the complainant. *** Learned State counsel has filed affidavit of Sh. Rattan Singh, Superintendent, Central Jail, Ambala … The same is taken on record. Heard counsel for the parties. The Crl. Misc. application has been filed seeking suspension of sentence of imprisonment of the applicant/appellant No.1- Lajja Ram during the pendency of the appeal. The … Kumar and Malkiat Singh (appellants in CRA not D-477- DB of 2012).Their sentences of imprisonment have been suspended vide order dated 26.9.2012 (Annexure P2) passed in CRM No.34317 of 2012 in (202) CRM No.72418 of 2012 in

Jasvir Kaur @ Gogi V. State of Punjab Vs. Unknown

Court: Punjab and Haryana

(202) CRM No.62062 of 2012 in [1].CRA not D-25-DB of 2011 Jasvir Kaur @ Gogi v. State of Punjab Present : Mr.Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate for the applicant/appellant. Mr.S.S.Dhaliwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. *** Learned State counsel … The same is taken on record. Heard counsel for the parties. The Crl. Misc. application has been filed seeking suspension of sentence of imprisonment of the applicant/appellant Jasvir Kaur @ Gogi. The FIR in the case has