See - Judgment Search Results

Sees Vs. Baksho

Court: Punjab and Haryana

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rs.No.3878 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 28th January, 2014 Sees Appellant Versus Baksho Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG1 Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed

See Vs. City of Seattle

Court: US Supreme Court

See v. City of Seattle - 387 U.S. 541 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court See v. City of Seattle, 387

Sees John Vs. Sales Tax Officer

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2006(3)KLT837

refund granted by the 2nd respondent to the petitioner, he could not have made any adjustments.4. It is seen from the records that the arrears are due from the petitioner under revised orders for 1986-87 dated 26-12-98

See (Dsidc) Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 4974/2011 29th August , 2013 SEE (DSIDC) ......Petitioner Through: Mr. S.C.Kalra, Adv. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. M.P.Singh, Adv.

Authority (See Nagendra Nath Bora Vs. Commissioner of Hills Division a ...

Court: Kolkata

exercising the or quasi-judicial quasi-judicial tribunals powers within or administrative the leading bodies strings of legality and to see that they do not exceed their statutory jurisdiction and correctly administer the law laid down by the statute

Sees Ram Vs. Union of India

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 63(1996)DLT890; 1996(38)DRJ663

dismissal reads: 'I have personally gone through the case of absence without leave in respect of No.68577168 ASI/RO Sees Ram of 47 Bn. Bsf, who has been absenting without leave wef 4.5.1989. 2.He was given an opportunity

See Vana Na Ramah Iyer and anr. Vs. S.R.M.A.G. Gopala Iyer and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1918)35MLJ355

to raise the point that she being a married woman, an inquiry would have to be held to see whether it was money belonging to her separata estate which in the ordinary course of events would be

Fisheries Products Co. Vs. Abraham S See and Depew

Court: US Supreme Court

FISHERIES PRODUCTS CO. v. ABRAHAM S SEE & DEPEW - 269 U.S. 566 (1925) U.S. Supreme Court FISHERIES PRODUCTS CO. v. ABRAHAM S SEE &

Whether Reporters of Local Papers May Be Allowed to See the Vs. Promil ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Present : Mr.G.I.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.”2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the

Whether Reporters of Local Papers May Be Allowed to See the Vs. State ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Present : Mr.G.S.Punia, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.”2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the