Skip to content
Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

See - Judgment Search Results

Jan 28 2014

Sees Vs. Baksho

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-28-2014

Rs.No.3878 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 28th January, 2014 Sees Appellant Versus Baksho Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG1


Jun 05 1967

See Vs. City of Seattle

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-05-1967

See v. City of Seattle - 387 U.S. 541 (1967) U.S.


Mar 10 2006

Sees John Vs. Sales Tax Officer

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-10-2006

Reported in: 2006(3)KLT837

petitioner, he could not have made any adjustments.4. It is seen from the records that the arrears are due from the


Aug 29 2013

See (Dsidc) Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-29-2013

DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 4974/2011 29th August , 2013 SEE (DSIDC) ......Petitioner Through: Mr. S.C.Kalra, Adv. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA


Aug 23 2012

Authority (See Nagendra Nath Bora Vs. Commissioner of Hills Division a ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-23-2012

or administrative the leading bodies strings of legality and to see that they do not exceed their statutory jurisdiction and correctly


Sep 01 1996

Sees Ram Vs. Union of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-01-1996

Reported in: 63(1996)DLT890; 1996(38)DRJ663

case of absence without leave in respect of No.68577168 ASI/RO Sees Ram of 47 Bn. Bsf, who has been absenting without


Apr 16 1918

See Vana Na Ramah Iyer and anr. Vs. S.R.M.A.G. Gopala Iyer and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-16-1918

Reported in: (1918)35MLJ355

married woman, an inquiry would have to be held to see whether it was money belonging to her separata estate which


1925

Fisheries Products Co. Vs. Abraham S See and Depew

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1925

FISHERIES PRODUCTS CO. v. ABRAHAM S SEE & DEPEW - 269 U.S. 566 (1925) U.S. Supreme Court


May 10 2013

Whether Reporters of Local Papers May Be Allowed to See the Vs. Promil ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-10-2013

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.”2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.”3.


May 10 2013

Whether Reporters of Local Papers May Be Allowed to See the Vs. State ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-10-2013

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.”2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.”3.


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »




Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial