Security - Judgment Search Results

Securities Vs. Dipak Patel

Court: Supreme Court of India

are being decided by this common judgment.2. This case revolves round the legality of ‘non-intermediary front- running’ in security market under the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (PROHIBITION OF FRAUDULENT AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES RELATING TO

Mr.c.shivakumar Reddy Vs. Securities &

Court: Karnataka

DIRECTOR, NO.32, PATTALLAMMA TEMPLE STREET, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU-560 004. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI SATYANARAYANA S CHALKE, ADVOCATE) AND M/S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA A STATUTORY BODY ESTABLISHED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD

National Securities Depository Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

investigation or inquiry or on completion of such investigation or inquiry, namely:- (a) suspend the trading of any security in a recognised stock exchange; (b) restrain persons from accessing the securities market and prohibit any person associated

Premium Global Securities Pvt.Ltd. and Ors Vs. Securities and Exchange ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3682 OF2006PREMIUM GLOBAL SECURITIES PVT. LTD. & ORS .. APPELLANTS VERSUS SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ANR. .. RESPONDENTS WITH

Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Distt. Vs. Security ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1987SC1370; (1987)89BOMLR254; [1987(54)FLR665]; JT1987(2)SC328; (1988)ILLJ146SC; 1987(1)SCALE1198; (1987)3SCC413; [1987]3SCR19; 1987(2)SLJ147(SC); 1987(2)LC252(SC)

J.1. It appears that there were serious complaints about the service conditions of about 70,000 persons working as Security Guards in various factories and establishments in Greater Bombay and Thane Industrial Complex, the majority of whom were

ise Securities and Services Ltd and Another Vs. Power Flow Securities ...

Court: Mumbai

Oral Judgment: Heard finally. 2. The Petitioner has invoked Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Petitioner challenges Award dated 3rd May, 2010 passed by the sole Arbitrator at Calcutta; because as per...

Lkp Securities Ltd. Vs. the Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2003)41SCL1SAT

and additionally, about Rs. 20 lacs of profit of Shri Bajaj had been retained by the Appellant as security and as such the aggregate margin available to the Appellant was approximately 23% of the total exposure. In

Nirmal Bang Securities Pvt. Ltd., Vs. the Chairman, Securities and

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

there were apprehensions of possible attempts by certain entities to distort the true price discovery and manipulate the securities market. In the said context preliminary investigations were carried out by the Respondent to find out the role

Sebi Vs. Biyani Securities Pvt. Ltd.

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

1. Biyani Securities Pvt Ltd. was a member of the Calcutta Stock Exchange and was registered with SEBI as a stock

Subhkam Securities Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Chairman, Securities and Exchange

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2003)3CompLJ301SAT

of ARBL and the possible violations of the rules, bye laws and regulations of BSE, provisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 1995