Section 577 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 577 Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 34,987 results (0.087 seconds)P.V. Hemalatha Vs. Kattamkandi Puthiya Maliackal Saheeda and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-20-2002
Reported in: AIR2002SC2445; 2002(5)ALT19(SC); 2002(2)BLJR1626; [2002(3)JCR34(SC)]; JT2002(Suppl1)SC494; 2002(2)KLT792(SC); 2002(4)SCALE662; (2002)5SCC548; [2002]3SCR1098
court held that the provision of sub section 2 of section
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTi.P. Malik Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)MPHT124; 2002(4)MPLJ367
from the post of assistant engineer through o a no 577 1993 he is seeking direction against respondents for payment of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTL.N. Mehta Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur
Decided on: Jul-29-2002
that out of this the ao treated gold ornaments weighing 577 82 gms as unexplained and so its value being rs
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSwierkiewicz Vs. Sorema N. A.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-26-2002
ritualistic furnco constr corp v waters 438 u s 567 577 1978 see also mcdonnell douglas supra at 802 n 13
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Craft
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-17-2002
long v earle 277 mich 505 517 269 n w 577 581 1936 each spouse is vested with an entire title
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTL.N. Mehta Vs. Asstt. Cit
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-29-2002
Reported in: (2002)76TTJ(NULL)876
we find no justification for the assessing officer to treat 577 88 gms of gold ornaments as excess or unexplained and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMukhtar Ahmed and anr. Vs. Mehraj-ud-dIn and anr.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Oct-09-2002
Reported in: AIR2003J& K69,2003(2)JKJ68
for the petitioners has placed reliance on air 1977 sc 577 and air 1985 karn 83 and submits that once the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGaneshwar Limited Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex., Allahabad
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2002
Reported in: (2002)(141)ELT654TriDel
..... party accordingly he has confirmed the aforesaid amount on the appellants under section 11a and also imposed a penalty of rs 9 lakhs on ..... 8 2 97 the fire accident caused extensive damage to 19 577 qtls of sugar stored therein the damaged sugar was salvaged and ..... already observed that the fire accident caused extensive damage to 19 577 qtls of sugar stored therein the damaged sugar was salvaged and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Bank of India (Overseas Branch) and anr. Vs. Commercial Tax Offi ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-16-2002
Reported in: [2003]132STC234(Cal)
..... to pay tax under sub section 1 or sub section 2 or sub section 4 of section 6 or sub section 3 of section 8 and is registered under ..... board of revenue v a m ansari reported in 1976 38 stc 577 18 in the first of the said two cases the honourable ..... honourable supreme court in a m ansari s case 1976 38 stc 577 wherein in explaining the expression business virtually the same definition was retained .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTZelman Vs. Simmons-harris
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-27-2002
..... indeed by all accounts the program has captured a remarkable cross section of private schools religious and nonreligious it is true that 82 ..... government largesse brings government regulation lee v weisman 505 u s 577 608 1992 blackmun j concurring the risk is already being realized ..... id at 431 see also lee v weisman 505 u s 577 588 1992 striking down school sanctioned prayer at high school graduation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial