Section 577 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 577 Year: 1908 Page 1 of about 739 results (0.111 seconds)Kuppuswami Chetty Vs. Samudra Vijia Nainar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-11-1908
Reported in: (1908)18MLJ586
..... appellate court varying that decree was quite within its pompetence under section 577 c p c 5 i therefore agree that this appeal should ..... the plaintiff did not put in any memorandum of objections under section 561 c p c in support of this contention kuluikada pillai ..... therefore no ground for putting in a memorandum of objections under section 561 c p c the district judge found that the plaintiff .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAhmad HusaIn and ors. Vs. Asma Bibi
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-23-1908
Reported in: (1908)ILR30All290
..... the results of a dismissal under it and of a confirmation under section 577 as indeed we think there must be dismissing an appeal is we ..... upon any principle but upon the change of language made in section 551 by section 47 of act vii of 1888 as appears from the ..... be inferred from a slight change made in the language of section 551 11 their lordships in the case of kistokinker no doubt remark that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWinters Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-06-1908
of the indians and the rule page 207 u s 577 should certainly be applied to determine between two inferences one
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGeneral Oil Co. Vs. Crain
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-23-1908
..... the state its operation is limited by the words of the first section which directs the governor to appoint inspectors for illuminating fluids which may ..... 10 wall 557 in pittsburg coal company v bates 156 u s 577 coal in barges shipped from pittsburg pennsylvania to baton rouge louisiana was ..... s 622 pittsburg coal company v bates 156 u s 577 and american steel wire co v speed ubi supra mr justice holmes .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDisconto Gesellshaft Vs. Umbreit
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-24-1908
..... over to said trusted that among other provisions the german bankrupt act contained the following sec 14 pending the bankruptcy proceedings neither the assets nor any other property of the bankrupt ..... paul hecking as trustee in bankruptcy so appointed in the bankruptcy page 208 u s 577 proceedings in germany and that after the commencement of the same the plaintiff the disconto .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Fid. and Guar. Co. Vs. Struthers Wells Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-06-1908
..... the act which is amended consists of but one material section the second section providing only for the comparatively unimportant matter of security for ..... are convinced congress did not intend such separation viewing the whole section we think congress meant that only in future cases should the ..... v american sugar co 202 u s 563 202 u s 577 the language of the amended act is prospective as it provides .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMinneapolis, St. P. and S.S.M. Ry. Co. Vs. Doughty
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-03-1908
..... play to construction or the analogies which the company invoke that section determines the priority of rights between railroads and settlers by explicit ..... definitely fixing the line of its proposed road over the quarter section the line as surveyed was marked by stakes driven into the ..... the contention is supported by kinion v railway co 118 mo 577 lewis v railway 17 utah 504 and it is urged by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Achutayya Vs. N.S. Thimmayya and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-18-1908
Reported in: (1908)18MLJ228
arbitrator the arbitrator made his award the defendant applied under section 521 civil procedure code to set aside the award the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Pachappa Chetty
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-06-1908
Reported in: (1908)18MLJ455
peon is not an abkari officer within the meaning of section 62 of the abkari act i of 1886 the conviction
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTthenappa Chettiar and anr. Vs. Marimuthu Nadan and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-03-1908
Reported in: (1908)18MLJ344
the prior mortgagee for his disregard of the provisions of section 85 of the transfer of property act the present case
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial