Section 577 - Judgment Search Results

Arumugam Chettiar Vs. V. Kalyanasundaram Pillai and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1961Mad495; (1961)2MLJ5

..... first instance and the other by the court of appeal section 577 civil procedure code therefore provides that the appellate judgment may be for confirming ..... final decree was passed the judgment debtor filed an application under section 36 of the bengal money lenders act for re opening ..... the appeal against an order refusing to grant relief under section 36 of the bengal money lenders act reliance was placed .....

State Vs. Nooka Maktumsab Jatgat

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1960Kant315; AIR1960Mys315; 1960CriLJ1476

order 1 this is a reference by the judicial magistrate first class badami under s 341 cr p c on...

Knetsch Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s 369 first the fact that the provision was incorporated in the section covering life insurance and endowment contracts which unquestionably was adopted to further ..... for the fifth circuit in united states v bond 258 f 2d 577 we granted certiorari 361 u s 958 on december 11 1953 ..... himself and judge hutcheson in united states v bond 258 f 2d 577 it is true that in this transaction the taxpayer was bound .....

Hoffman Vs. Blaski

Court: US Supreme Court

..... actual convenience from determining the place of trial the limitations upon the section should only be those which recognize legitimate countervailing considerations to the free ..... see e g felchlin v american smelting refining co 136 f supp 577 d c s d cal 1955 transfer denied on defendant s ..... c del 1950 felchlin v american smelting refining co 136 f supp 577 d c s d cal 1955 see also johnson v harris .....

The Indian Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. Baker Ali

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1961Cal515,64CWN641

..... point for its computation so far as the opening part of the section sec 9 of the west bengal non agicultural tenancy act 1949 is concerned ..... b s which was the date of the relevant kabuliyat vide p 577 from the fact that the yearly rent was payable according to the ..... bengali calendar and had been paid vide p 577 referring to exts d and d 1 for bengali calendar years the .....

Parker Vs. Ellis

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of english law 123 124 footnote 17 28 u s c 2241 c footnote 18 section 2255 of course is available only with respect to federal judgments whereas habeas corpus is available ..... v united states 319 u s 41 319 u s 43 page 362 u s 577 it is likewise true that a motion for relief under 28 u s c 2255 .....

National Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Ashutosh Mukherjee

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1962Cal27

..... alarge number of cases are remediable by moneycompensation 32 the learned author also refers to section 55 of the specific relief act and in particular to illustration e thereto 33 mr ..... against cheap labour and the sweating system of contract work chitty j observed at p 577 the court always acts with the greatest caution and is keenly alive to the difficulty .....

Steelworkers Vs. Warrior and Gulf Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of management shall not be subject to arbitration under this section although acquiescing for 19 years in the employer s interpretation that ..... of management shall not be subject to arbitration under this section should differences arise between the company and the union or ..... is reached the parties shall jointly petition page 363 u s 577 the united states conciliation service for suggestion of a list .....

Flemming Vs. Nestor

Court: US Supreme Court

..... other provisions of this title a no monthly benefit under this section or section 223 42 u s c 423 relating to disability insurance benefits ..... of unlawful entry conviction of a crime or subversive activity the section in addition covers those deported for such socially condemned acts as ..... lynch v united states 292 u s 571 292 u s 576 577 the right to social security benefits is in one sense earned .....

Kumara Pillai Vs. Thomas

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1961Ker287

hearing and adjournment ex parte was made i do not sec any ground for extending its operationto all subsequent hearings of