Section 539 - Judgment Search Results

Smt. Vijay Khanna and ors. Vs. V.K. Kapoor and Associates Pvt.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2007)139CompCas524

..... of the petitioners but have also indulged in committing offences under sections 539 540 541 542 and 628 of the companies act 4 ..... asked for it was argued that the provision of section 69 section 71 section 72 and section 113 of the companies act 1956 must be ..... relevant factor to be considered in the equitable proceedings under sections 397 398 in sri kanta datta narasimharaja wadiyar v venkateshwar .....

Smt. Manju and anr. Vs. Ghanshyam and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2008MP168; 2008(1)MPHT54

..... argued that commissioners appointed under one statute cannot swear affidavits prescribed under another statute and section 539 of the code of criminal procedure is also cited as an instance this may be ..... versa but that is because the restriction is to be found in section 139 of the one code and section 539 of the other rule 94 a makes no such condition and makes .....

Schriro Vs. Landrigan

Court: US Supreme Court

to conduct a constitutionally adequate investigation see wiggins v smith 539 u s 510 2003 in spite of this the court

Parents Involved in Community Schools Vs. Seattle School Dist. No. 1

Court: US Supreme Court

..... desegregating the public schools seattle washington 1954 1968 p 6 dissertation draft 1979 hereinafter pieroth section 2 preliminary challenges 1956 to 1969 1 pieroth 32 41 hanawalt 4 2 hanawalt ..... be rejected as facially invalid grutter itself reiterated that outright racial balancing is patently unconstitutional 539 u s at 330 accepting racial balancing as a compelling state interest would justify .....

Sh. K.S. Murali S/O Late Shri Vs. Government of India Through

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

shall be paid with interest 9 per annum oa no 539 2005 decided by lucknow bench of this tribunal on 23

Rosali V. Vs. Taico Bank and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2007SC998; 2007(2)AWC1965(SC); [2007(2)JCR92(SC)]; JT2007(2)SC611; (2007)146PLR375; RLW2007(3)SC2026; 2007(2)SCALE301

is impossible 21 in crawford on statutory construction at page 539 it is stated 271 miscellaneous implied exceptions from the requirements

Pankaj Kumar and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

revision survey map as mentioned in rules 537 538 and 539 of technical rule of the settlement department as such even

Federal Election Comm’n Vs. WisconsIn Right to Life, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... upheld 203 against a first amendment facial challenge even though the section encompassed not only campaign speech or express advocacy promoting a candidate ..... speech through the threat of burdensome litigation see virginia v hicks 539 u s 113 119 and it must eschew the open ended ..... speech through the threat of burdensome litigation see virginia v hicks 539 u s 113 119 2003 and it must eschew the open .....

Watters Vs. Wachovia Bank, N. A.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 34 e 3 an operating subsidiary conducts activities authorized under this section pursuant to the same authorization terms and conditions that apply to ..... duplicative state regulation see e g beneficial nat bank v anderson 539 u s 1 10 2003 national banking system protected from possible ..... and necessary and proper clauses see citizens bank v alafabco inc 539 u s 52 58 2003 per curiam the tenth amendment .....

Wallace Vs. Kato

Court: US Supreme Court

..... f 3d 421 427 2006 we granted certiorari 547 u s 2006 ii section 1983 provides a federal cause of action but in several respects relevant here ..... law tolling rules e g hardin v straub 490 u s 536 538 539 and is unaware of illinois cases providing tolling in even remotely comparable ..... length of statutes of limitation hardin v straub 490 u s 536 538 539 1989 board of regents of univ of state of n y v .....