Section 539 - Judgment Search Results

Hemdan Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1966CriLJ60

..... to be used in proceedings under section 145 of the code obviously sections 539 and 539 a do not apply section 539 relates to affidavits and affirmations to ..... and affirmations which are to be used before any high court section 539 aa which has also been newly added by act no ..... used before any high court or any officer of such court section 539 a deals with affidavits filed in the course of enquiry trial .....

Kamal NaraIn Sharma Vs. Shri Pandit Dwarka Prasad Mishra and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1966SC436; [1966]1SCR478

..... empowered in this behalf may administer the oath to the deponent similarly section 539 of the code of criminal procedure provides 539 courts and person before whom affidavits may be sworn affidavits and ..... and rules 20 and 34 of code of civil procedure 1908 and sections 139 and 539 of criminal procedure code 1898 election of respondent challenged by appellant on various grounds election tribunal .....

Griswold Vs. Connecticut

Court: US Supreme Court

..... days nor more than one year or be both fined and imprisoned section 54 196 provides any person who assists abets counsels causes hires or ..... opinion in poe v ullman 367 u s 497 367 u s 539 555 footnote 2 3 indeed brother white appears to have gone ..... of justice poe v ullman 367 u s 497 367 u s 539 dissenting opinion intolerable and unjustifiable perhaps the clearest frankest and briefest explanation .....

City of El Paso Vs. Simmons

Court: US Supreme Court

..... this act or any future law provided further that nothing in this section contained shall be construed to inhibit the state from instituting such ..... party constitutional immunity against change honeyman v jacobs 306 u s 539 gelfert v national city bank 313 u s 221 east new ..... its own circumstances later in honeyman v jacobs 306 u s 539 306 u s 542 chief justice hughes the author of blaisdell .....

Estes Vs. Texas

Court: US Supreme Court

..... trial judge s orders merely limited news photographers to the spectator section ii the decision below affirming petitioner s conviction runs counter to ..... dealt with and not unjustly condemned pp 381 u s 538 539 c the freedom granted to the press under the first ..... accused would be fairly dealt with and page 381 u s 539 not unjustly condemned history had proven that secret tribunals were effective .....

Meat Cutters Vs. Jewel Tea

Court: US Supreme Court

..... from lawfully carrying out the legitimate objects thereof footnote 2 3 section page 381 u s 702 20 barred federal court injunctions in ..... antitrust issue see united states v hod carriers 313 u s 539 affirming united states v carrozzo 37 f supp 191 d ..... see united states v building construction trades council 313 u s 539 footnote 2 13 in pennington the collective bargaining agreement restricted subleasing .....

Cox Vs. Louisiana

Court: US Supreme Court

of racial equality a civil rights page 379 u s 539 organization the appellant an ordained congregational minister the reverend mr

United Mine Workers Vs. Pennington

Court: US Supreme Court

..... neither 20 nor 4 expressly deals with arrangements or agreements between unions and employers neither section tells us whether any or all such arrangements or agreements are barred or permitted by ..... hutcheson 312 u s 219 united states v international hod carriers council 313 u s 539 affirming per curiam 37 f supp 191 d c n d ill 1941 united states .....

Cox Vs. Louisiana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 1 see parts 383 u s s 580 ii of his opinion footnote 3 2 section 722 of the penal law of new york in effect at that time stated any ..... 379 u s 575 are indivisible concepts gibson v florida legislative comm 372 u s 539 372 u s 546 the application of these principles requires us to reverse the judgment .....

Venkitammal and anr. Vs. Muthukrishna Naidu and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1967Mad196

..... members of a joint family but it will be notices that the illustration under this section refers only to male heirs inheriting the stirdhana property of a female hindu in ch ..... the judicial committee in katama natchiar v raja of shivagunga 1863 9 moo ind app 539 at p 611 the right of survivorship cannot exist apart from the right of joint .....