Section 539 - Judgment Search Results

K.A. Veeraraghva Tathachariar and ors. Vs. R. Krishnaswamy Thathachari ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 7Ind.Cas.900

order1 this suit is brought under section 539 and section 30 civil procedure code for a declaration that a ..... in the lower appellate court civil procedure code act xiv of 1882 sections 503 539 receiver appointment of suit for scheme for temple without a ..... objected for the defendants that the court had no jurisdiction under section 503 civil procedure code to appoint a receiver as the temple property .....

K.A. Veeraraghava Tathachariar and ors. Vs. R. Krishnasamy Thathachari ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1910)20MLJ638

..... 16th january 1908 this suit is brought under section 539 and section 30 civil procedure code for a declaration that a scheme ..... objected for the defendants that the court had no jurisdiction under section 503 civil procedure code to appoint a receiver as the temple property was ..... subject of the suit within the meaning of the words in section 503 civil procedure code the whole aim and object of the suit .....

Sir Dinshaw Manockji Petit and ors. Vs. Sir Jamsetji Jeejeebhoy and or ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2Ind.Cas.701

..... was hold that it did not fall either under section 30 or section 539 of the code it was there held that if ..... institute this suit obtained in accordance with the provisions of section 539 of the civil procedure code make any difference in their position are ..... religion zoroastrian punchayat meaning of civil procedure code act xiv of 1882 section 539 further or other relief meaning of having an interest in .....

D'Cruz and Ors. Vs. D'Silva and Ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1Ind.Cas.995

..... maintain a representative suit like this without the sanction or leave obtained either under section 539 or section 30 of the civil procedure code but it is contended by the learned vakil for the ..... maintain a representative suit like this without the sanction or leave obtained either under section 539 or section 30 of the civil procedure code i adopt this proposition as correctly stating the law and .....

Continental Paper Bag Co. Vs. Eastern Paper Bag Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... mechanism for timing the movements of the rotating cylinder and the forming plate footnote 2 sec 4888 before any inventor or discoverer shall receive a patent for his invention or discovery ..... raymond 6 pet 242 31 u s 243 and in bloomer v mcquewan 14 how 539 chief justice taney said the franchise which the patent grants consists altogether in the right .....

Drumm-flato Commission Co. Vs. Edmisson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... debtor and that 2615 of the oklahoma statutes of 1893 controls that section reads as follows in an action for the breach of an obligation ..... and drumm flato commission co v gerlach bank 107 mo app 426 section 4277 is as follows entries in books of account may be admitted ..... not arising from page 208 u s 539 contract and in every case of oppression fraud or malice interest may .....

Brown Vs. Fletcher's Estate

Court: US Supreme Court

..... is whether the michigan courts gave force and effect to the first section of article iv of the federal constitution which provides that full ..... court ordering the process such also is the statutory provision in massachusetts section 1 c 170 mass rev laws 1902 reads a personal action ..... such persons or property in any other tribunals story confl laws s 539 page 210 u s 90 fletcher at the time of his .....

Nana Tawker Vs. Ramachandra Tawker and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2Ind.Cas.519

..... case of re union after partition the mitakshara makes provision in chapter ii section 9 and it is clear therefore that the re united sons would take ..... or immoveable but the dictum of the mitakshara contained in clause 27 of section i of chapter i and in clause 10 of the same chapter that ..... s case katama natehiar v the rajah of shivaganga 9 m i a 539 2 w r 31 he refers to the remarks at page 609 of .....

Employers' Liability Cases

Court: US Supreme Court

..... questions of negligence and contributory negligence shall be for the jury sec 3 that no contract of employment insurance relief benefit or ..... in its cars engines appliances machinery track roadbed ways or works sec 2 that in all actions hereafter brought against any common ..... but it is earnestly urged upon us page 207 u s 539 that the statute under consideration applying to all interstate common .....

United States Vs. Graf Distilling Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... should be answered in the negative it will be so certified sec 3455 whenever any person sells gives purchases or receives any box ..... in itself yet nevertheless comes within the plain prohibition of this section and effect must be given to that prohibition because it may ..... heretofore in our history united states v ulrici 3 dill 532 539 and yet we cannot persuade ourselves that the act proved in .....