Section 462 - Judgment Search Results

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Bhooraji and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2001VIAD(SC)624; AIR2001SC3372; 2001(2)ALD(Cri)604; 2001ALLMR(Cri)2185(SC); 2001CriLJ4228; 2001(4)Crimes190(SC); JT2001(7)SC55; 2002(1)MPHT1; 2001(5)SCALE423; (2001)7SCC679

..... the ground of his not being so empowered 13 it is useful to refer to section 462 of the code which says that even proceedings conducted n a wrong sessions divisions are ..... falls within chapter xxxv under the caption irregular proceedings the chapter consists of seven sections starting with section 460 containing a catalogue or irregularities which the legislature though not enough to axe .....

M.M. Nagalinga Nadar Sons Rep. by Its Partner D. Kanagasabai Vs. Sri L ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2001)3MLJ523

..... grounds it was invalid as not complying with the condition imposed by section 462 of the code of civil procedure 1882 in that one of ..... que trust and iii the expression income from property used in section 6 and section 9 of the indian income tax act 1922 refers to ..... and therefore their application for execution would certainly be maintainable under section 146 of the code of procedure code 37 mr t r .....

Radha Vallabh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2001CriLJ3238; 2001(4)WLC524; 2001(3)WLN148

..... under sub section 2 of section 462 then no court shall take cognizance of an offence under section 468 1 ..... subject however to the power vested in court to extend the period of limitation under section ..... is dismissed at the admission stage criminal procedure code 1973 section 468 limitation for taking cognizance date of .....

Correctional Services Corp. Vs. Malesko

Court: US Supreme Court

foreclose its extension here see e g bush v lucas 462 u s 367 bivens purpose is to deter individual federal

Concrete Products and Construction Co. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uo ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR2002Mad95; (2002)1MLJ158

proposed recovery of a sum of rs 1 80 92 462 in the case of the petitioner in w p no

Federal Election Comm'n Vs. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Comm.

Court: US Supreme Court

clumsy attempts to pass contributions through to candidates ante at 462 the court however does not cite any evidence to support

illinois Vs. Mcarthur

Court: US Supreme Court

neutral magistrate after finding probable cause united states v place 462 u s 696 701 1983 we nonetheless have made it

S.S. Singh, Port Officer, Vs. Commissioner of Customs and

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in: (2002)(139)ELT639Tri(Kol.)kata

the total quantity imported vide board s letter f no 462 4183 cus v dated 15 4 83 he therefore submitted

Bharat Forge Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2001)(133)ELT638Tri(Mum.)bai

decision in shree pipe ltd vs cce 1992 59 elt 462 and held that the cost would be includible 4 the

United States Vs. United Foods, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

au thorized that kind of regulation 521 u s at 462 emphasis added see also id at 461 citing agricultural marketing